G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1760
来源IDRR-1760-COMCI
Engaging Consumers in the Quality Measurement Enterprise
Thomas W. Concannon; Mark W. Friedberg; Ann Hwang; Kris Wiitala
发表日期2017-01-10
出版年2017
页码43
语种英语
结论

Six Barriers to Consumer Involvement in the Measure Development Process

  • Unequal Power: An inherent power differential exists between consumers, who have fewer available resources, and professionals, who are generally employed in the health care sector. Imbalances of power can be especially acute during technical stages of quality measurement, including creating measure concepts, specifying measures, and testing measures.
  • Limited Menus: In some cases, invitations to participate in the quality measurement process are made to consumers after much of the early work has been completed. This approach leaves consumers out of some of the most important decisions that are made in quality measurement work — that is, what priorities to set, rather than which measures to use.
  • Critical Mass: Quality measurement discussions often occur at stakeholder committees or expert panels that tap a handful of consumer advocates who are expected to represent a broad range of consumer experiences. The inherently diffuse nature of consumer representation argues for ensuring a critical mass of consumers.
  • Flat Footed: Consumer and community input is sometimes solicited but consumer organizations do not always have adequate time to respond to requests for involvement.
  • Closed Doors: Some parts of the quality measurement process may not currently involve consumers. Certain communications about quality measurement efforts happen through informal channels or parts of the process that are open to consumers in one state or location may be closed to consumers in another.
  • Dual Focus: When participating in the quality measurement process, it can be a challenge to keep track of both the big picture and the details.
摘要

Quality measurement is critical to helping providers, purchasers, payers, and consumers identify high-quality care and improve the quality of care. The opportunities and challenges for consumers to engage in quality measurement warrant careful examination. This report addresses concerns of consumer advocates about making quality measurement more consumer-centered. The report explores the experience of consumer advocates in engaging with quality measurement, identifies barriers to effective consumer engagement, and suggests ways to address those barriers. This report is intended for decisionmakers in quality measurement organizations and for consumer advocates.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Key Steps in Creating and Using Quality Measures

  • Chapter Three

    Barriers to Consumer Participation and Potential Solutions

  • Chapter Four

    Recommendations

  • Appendix

    Discussion Questions for Representatives of Consumer Advocacy Organizations

主题Health Care Delivery Approaches ; Health Care Program Evaluation ; Health Care Quality Measurement ; Patient Experience
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1760.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523214
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Thomas W. Concannon,Mark W. Friedberg,Ann Hwang,et al. Engaging Consumers in the Quality Measurement Enterprise. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1760.pdf(916KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1535046381000.jpg.p(1KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Thomas W. Concannon]的文章
[Mark W. Friedberg]的文章
[Ann Hwang]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Thomas W. Concannon]的文章
[Mark W. Friedberg]的文章
[Ann Hwang]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Thomas W. Concannon]的文章
[Mark W. Friedberg]的文章
[Ann Hwang]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1760.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1535046381000.jpg.pagespeed.ic.O7FmylveIj.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。