全球智库信息集成服务系统

Scientific Literature Supports Some Deployment Transition Center (DTC) Practices, but Others Are Contraindicated

• The DTC program consists of a rest and relaxation component, an after-action interview to provide feedback for leadership, a psychoeducational component on successful transitions from a deployment to home that is very similar to the Army's Battlemind program, and a component that is similar to several posttraumatic debriefing programs studied in civilian populations.
• The Army's Battlemind program has been shown to produce small reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, depression symptoms, and sleep disturbance symptoms post-deployment among those with combat experiences; elements of the DTC program that borrow from Battlemind may be beneficial.
• Psychological debriefing programs — a primary prevention program involving groups of nondiagnosed individuals discussing and emotionally processing stressful incidents — have been well studied in a variety of populations and repeatedly been found to be either ineffective or harmful to participants. U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and World Health Organization treatment guidelines for traumatized populations specifically recommend against these programs because of the lack of efficacy and potential for harm.

Most DTC Attendees Were Satisfied with the Program

• Eighty percent of DTC participants believed the program was a worthwhile experience, and 74 percent believed they were better prepared for reintegration after completing the program.

DTC Did Not Improve Measured Post-Deployment Outcomes

• A comparison of DTC attendees and a control group of airmen showed no evidence of significant reductions in PTSD symptoms, frequency of depression symptoms, binge drinking, or social conflicts attributable to DTC.

It is often accepted as common knowledge that military personnel benefit from decompression time between a war zone and the home station. To capitalize on the potential benefits of a decompression period paired with support services, the U.S. Air Force established the Deployment Transition Center (DTC) at Ramstein Air Base in Germany in July 2010. The DTC provides airmen returning from combat missions with an opportunity to decompress and share lessons learned before returning to their home stations.

The authors of this report evaluate the structure, processes, and outcomes of the DTC program. They find that, although a majority of participants found the DTC program worthwhile, a comparison of DTC participants and similar airmen who did not participate the program shows no evidence that the program helps reduce posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, depressive symptoms, binge drinking, or social conflicts with family and coworkers. In addition, one of the DTC program elements appears to be similar to posttraumatic debriefing interventions, which several studies have found to be either ineffective or harmful. For these reasons, if the main goals of the DTC program are to improve behavioral health and social conflict outcomes, the authors recommend that the DTC program be discontinued or redesigned and Air Force resources invested in alternative programs. However, if the DTC program has other goals, such as providing rest and relaxation to airmen after a difficult deployment or capturing after-action information, then the authors recommend that these goals be documented and the DTC program be more specifically tailored to them.

• Chapter One

  Evaluation Approach and Program Description

• Chapter Two

  Review of Reintegration and PTSD Prevention Programs

• Chapter Three

  Participant Satisfaction with the Deployment Transition Center

• Chapter Four

  The Effects of DTC Attendance on Psychological Symptoms, Alcohol Use, and Social Conflict: A Propensity Score–Based Approach

• Chapter Five

  Conclusions and Recommendations

• Appendix A

  Outcome Evaluation Using Propensity Score Matching with Synchronous Controls

• Appendix B

  Investigating the Differences Between the RAND and the Psychology Research Service Analytic Group's Analyses