G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1566.1
来源IDRR-1566/1-EDA
Medical Support to Light Footprint Operations: Why smaller operations require a different approach to medical support
Susanne Sondergaard; Marta Kepe; James Sladden; Adam C. Resnick; Darryl Metcalf; Ann C. Sims-Columbia; Anthony Marinos
发表日期2017-06-09
出版年2015
页码11
语种英语
结论

No definition of light footprint operations has been proposed

  • Given that there is no definition of a light footprint operation in EU doctrine despite a number of EU missions having its characteristics, the study proposed a new definition that has been developed to be consistent with existing related EU policies and doctrines.

Current medical support practices to operations are varied

  • Case studies showed that while there are standard operating procedures, agreement and doctrinal requirements of medical capabilities in place, each national medical treatment facility or element works to its own national clinical standard.

European medical support capabilities differ depending on country priorities

  • Findings from the survey on the medical capabilities of the European Defence Agency's participating member states showed that the more complex or advanced the medical capabilities were the more likely the gaps at European level.

European countries are interested in standardisation and harmonisation among their militaries and with civilian sector

  • While different cultures and expectations exist within Europe with regards to medical support, overall the development of common standards was seen positively.

New technologies can improve resilience of soldiers and enhance medical support for LFOs

  • While technology may assist in improving medical support in LFOs, further development and monitoring is required to ensure that they are fit-for-purpose and that possible concerns are answered.

Medical support options have been developed and their feasibility assessed

  • Medical support feasibility assessment was carried out for four different LFO scenarios and options for the lowest possible capacity that can be generated for LFOS were developed.
摘要

Light Footprint Operations (LFO) is a concept not currently found in EU doctrine, despite a number of recent EU military missions being characterised as: involving a limited number of personnel deployed with no host nation support; seeking to leave small infrastructure footprint; being relatively short. Whilst so far all EU missions without host nation support have deployed medical support for more traditionally defined medical capabilities (Role 1 and Role 2 medical treatment facilities (MTFs)), these capabilities are designed to support larger military formations in both permissive and hostile operating environments.

,

This study was carried out in support to the European Defence Agency's work to achieve more efficient medical support to LFO carried out as part of the EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). A selection of methodologies was employed, including concept development, case study analysis, literature reviews, interviews, expert workshop, survey on European medical support capabilities and attitudes towards multinational cooperation and harmonisation, scenario development, medical technology scan and feasibility assessments. The study proposes a definition for LFO and concludes with a set of recommendations on current doctrine, harmonisation and standardisation, modularisation of Roles, multinational cooperation in technology development and deployment and engagement with civilian medical community.

目录 Medical Support to Light Footprint Operations: Why smaller operations require a different approach to medical support | RAND
主题Combat Medicine ; European Union ; Military Mobilization ; Military Tactics
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1566z1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523313
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susanne Sondergaard,Marta Kepe,James Sladden,et al. Medical Support to Light Footprint Operations: Why smaller operations require a different approach to medical support. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1566z1.pdf(1393KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1600181900650.jpg(10KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susanne Sondergaard]的文章
[Marta Kepe]的文章
[James Sladden]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susanne Sondergaard]的文章
[Marta Kepe]的文章
[James Sladden]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susanne Sondergaard]的文章
[Marta Kepe]的文章
[James Sladden]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1566z1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1600181900650.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。