G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1664
来源IDRR-1664-AF
A New Methodology for Conducting Product Support Business Case Analysis (BCA): With Illustrations from the F-22 Product Support BCA
Frank Camm; John Matsumura; Lauren A. Mayer; Kyle Siler-Evans
发表日期2017-06-13
出版年2017
语种英语
结论 A New Methodology for Conducting Product Support Business Case Analysis (BCA): With Illustrations from the F-22 Product Support BCA | RAND
摘要

Department of Defense (DoD) product support business case analyses (BCAs) compare alternative courses of action (COAs) for sustaining weapon systems and recommend ways to improve on current sustainment practice. This document explains how to apply standard Office of Management and Budget and DoD guidance on project evaluation to product support BCAs in a way that allows senior DoD decisionmakers to use net present value (NPV) as the dominant figure of merit for comparing COAs. It identifies a primary performance attribute and estimates the cost of ensuring that every COA meets a target level of performance for this attribute. This begins a process of estimating the annual cash flows for each COA relative to a baseline COA. The approach then elicits from subject matter experts (1) what sources of risk might delay or thwart each COA's efforts to achieve target performance and (2) how each source of risk affects each COA's efforts. It allows these efforts to differ across potential future states. Each future state yields a different set of annual cash flows based on (1) the cash flows associated with trouble-free implementation, including transition and implementation costs and savings, and (2) the effects of sources of risk that degrade implementation. The approach ultimately states the findings of a BCA in terms of dollar values of NPVs for COAs — figures that senior decisionmakers understand intuitively, because they use them routinely in decisions about defense resource management.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Assessing the NPV of a COA Element

  • Chapter Three

    Risk Drivers Relevant to COA Elements

  • Chapter Four

    Aggregating Information on Different Risk Drivers Relevant to a COA Element

  • Chapter Five

    Formal Elicitation of Information on Risk Associated with COA Elements

  • Chapter Six

    Integrating the Pieces to Characterize a COA

  • Chapter Seven

    Providing Support for Senior Decisionmakers

  • Appendix A

    Risk Workshop "Homework" Materials

  • Appendix B

    Risk Workshop Facilitation Protocol

主题Business Process Improvement ; Fighter Aircraft ; Military Budgets and Defense Spending ; Military Logistics ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1664.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523315
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Frank Camm,John Matsumura,Lauren A. Mayer,et al. A New Methodology for Conducting Product Support Business Case Analysis (BCA): With Illustrations from the F-22 Product Support BCA. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1664.pdf(1785KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1505841857844.jpg(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Frank Camm]的文章
[John Matsumura]的文章
[Lauren A. Mayer]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Frank Camm]的文章
[John Matsumura]的文章
[Lauren A. Mayer]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Frank Camm]的文章
[John Matsumura]的文章
[Lauren A. Mayer]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1664.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1505841857844.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。