G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2022
来源IDRR-2022-RS
Understanding mental health in the research environment: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
Susan Guthrie; Catherine A. Lichten; Janna van Belle; Sarah Ball; Anna Knack; Joanna Hofman
发表日期2017-08-22
出版年2017
页码94
语种英语
结论

The evidence base

  • The majority of the identified literature on prevalence relates to wellbeing and work-related stress (rather than clinically defined mental health conditions) among academic staff and postgraduate students in university settings. There is little evidence on researchers in other settings, such as industry.

Prevalence

  • Survey data indicate that the majority of university staff find their job stressful. Levels of burnout appear higher among university staff than in general working populations and are comparable to 'high-risk' groups such as healthcare workers.
  • The proportions of both university staff and postgraduate students with a risk of having or developing a mental health problem, based on self-reported evidence, were generally higher than for other working populations.
  • Large proportions (>40 per cent) of postgraduate students report symptoms of depression, emotion or stress-related problems, or high levels of stress.

Environmental factors

  • In large-scale surveys, UK higher education staff have reported worse wellbeing than staff in other types of employment (including education, and health and social work) in the areas of work demands, change management, support provided by managers and clarity about one's role.
  • The only area where higher education staff have reported higher wellbeing in large-scale surveys is in job control, though even here results are mixed across studies.
  • PhD students face similar challenges to other researchers and higher education staff.

Interventions

  • Evidence around the effectiveness of interventions to support the mental health of researchers is thin. Few interventions are described in the literature and even fewer of those have been evaluated.
摘要

This study aimed to establish what is known about the mental health of researchers based on the existing literature. There is limited published evidence on the prevalence of specific mental health conditions among researchers. The majority of the identified literature on prevalence relates to work-related stress among academic staff and postgraduate students in university settings.

,

Survey data indicate that the majority of university staff find their job stressful. Levels of burnout appear higher among university staff than in general working populations and are comparable to 'high-risk' groups such as healthcare workers. The proportions of both university staff and postgraduate students with a risk of having or developing a mental health problem, based on self-reported evidence, were generally higher than for other working populations. Large proportions (>40 per cent) of postgraduate students report symptoms of depression, emotion or stress-related problems, or high levels of stress.

,

Factors including increased job autonomy, involvement in decision making and supportive management were linked to greater job satisfaction among academics, as was the amount of time spent on research. Opportunities for professional development were also associated with reduced stress. UK higher education (HE) and research staff report worse wellbeing, as compared to staff in other sectors, in most aspects of work that can affect workers' stress levels.

,

The evidence around the effectiveness of interventions to support the mental health of researchers specifically is thin. Few interventions are described in the literature and even fewer of those have been evaluated.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Methods

  • Chapter Three

    How are 'mental health' and 'wellbeing' understood in research environments?

  • Chapter Four

    What is currently known about researchers' mental health and wellbeing compared to other populations?

  • Chapter Five

    What interventions are used to support researchers, and what evidence is there of their effectiveness?

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusions and future directions

主题Depression ; Scientific Professions ; Workforce Management ; Workplace Wellness Programs
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2022.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523364
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susan Guthrie,Catherine A. Lichten,Janna van Belle,et al. Understanding mental health in the research environment: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2022.pdf(540KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1503414335386.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susan Guthrie]的文章
[Catherine A. Lichten]的文章
[Janna van Belle]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susan Guthrie]的文章
[Catherine A. Lichten]的文章
[Janna van Belle]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susan Guthrie]的文章
[Catherine A. Lichten]的文章
[Janna van Belle]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2022.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1503414335386.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。