Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1933 |
来源ID | RR-1933-UNC |
Landscape Survey to Support Flood Apex National Flood Decision Support Toolbox: Definitions and Existing Tools | |
Aaron Strong; Debra Knopman | |
发表日期 | 2017-09-07 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Decision Analysis and Support Frameworks and Indicators Need to Be Tailored to Each Individual Community
As the Resilience Paradigm Has Grown, So Have Decision Support Systems and Tools and the Thinking About the Decisions Needed in the First Place
|
摘要 | This report summarizes the literature on definitions of resilience to flood risk, conceptual system-of-systems frameworks to analyze resilience, metric and indicator systems for measuring resilience, and examples of resilience-building in action at the community level. The literature suggests three main themes associated with the concept of resilience: (1) reducing the likelihood of a disaster and a community's ability to absorb or resist a shock, (2) increasing a system's adaptability while still maintaining function in the presence of a shock, and (3) reducing the time to recovery to normal functioning that might differ from pre-event functioning. These themes translate into capacities at the community or regional level that are essential to achieving resilience: absorptive or resistive capacity, adaptive capacity, and restorative capacity. Conceptual frameworks can be categorized into two groups: systems that segment the world by public service sectors (e.g., electric, water, and transportation) and systems that segment along functional lines (e.g., social, built, or natural). ,Additionally, this report provides a catalog of decision support tools for flood mitigation efforts and provides examples of how they have been used in practice. The authors' goals were to present a structure for thinking about decision support in the context of flood risk reduction, management, and resilience; briefly overview each of the tools that meet the authors' criteria for decision support; use several examples to illustrate how these tools have been used in different settings; and make recommendations to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security about whether further investigation into the models is warranted. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Community Resilience ; Emergency Preparedness ; Flooding |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1933.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523376 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Aaron Strong,Debra Knopman. Landscape Survey to Support Flood Apex National Flood Decision Support Toolbox: Definitions and Existing Tools. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR1933.pdf(1540KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
1504790457824.jpg(10KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Aaron Strong]的文章 |
[Debra Knopman]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Aaron Strong]的文章 |
[Debra Knopman]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Aaron Strong]的文章 |
[Debra Knopman]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。