Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1063 |
来源ID | RR-1063-A |
Conflict Trends and Conflict Drivers: An Empirical Assessment of Historical Conflict Patterns and Future Conflict Projections | |
Thomas S. Szayna; Angela O'Mahony; Jennifer Kavanagh; Stephen Watts; Bryan Frederick; Tova C. Norlen; Phoenix Voorhies | |
发表日期 | 2017-09-12 |
出版年 | 2017 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Trends in Conflict
Key Factors in Change in Conflict Patterns
Future Projections of Conflict
|
摘要 | Armed conflict has declined in both frequency and intensity since the end of the Cold War. The trends are especially clear for interstate conflict, but they also hold true for intrastate conflict. Taking into account historical trends and projections of key conflict drivers, the interstate and intrastate baseline future conflict projections in this report depict a continued decline through 2040, with interstate conflict down to extremely low levels and a much lower incidence of intrastate conflict. Some divergence from these projections is likely. The three factors that most strongly increased interstate conflict expectations were declining U.S. preeminence, declining capabilities of international organizations, and declining prevalence of consolidated democracies. The incidence of intrastate conflict is expected to increase if the capacity of state institutions or the rate of economic growth declines. Although the authors' projections indicate that interstate conflict may be rare in the future, the United States must retain a ready and credible land power deterrent to ensure such a future. Such a deterrent might not be used frequently, but its very existence delays the rise of a challenger and has a dampening effect on the incidence of conflict. The authors' projections also indicate that intrastate conflict (including proxy wars) will continue to be the main form of conflict incidence and, given the U.S. position in the international state system, Army forces are likely to become engaged in such conflicts. The trends toward a decrease in conflict incidence do not necessarily mean fewer U.S. interventions. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Democracy ; Global Security ; Military Force Planning ; Military Logistics ; Threat Assessment |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1063.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523380 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Thomas S. Szayna,Angela O'Mahony,Jennifer Kavanagh,et al. Conflict Trends and Conflict Drivers: An Empirical Assessment of Historical Conflict Patterns and Future Conflict Projections. 2017. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR1063.pdf(6853KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
1505217171029.jpg(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。