G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2099
来源IDRR-2099-NIJ
Knowing More, But Accomplishing What? Developing Approaches to Measure the Effects of Information-Sharing on Criminal Justice Outcomes
Brian A. Jackson; Lane F. Burgette; Caroline Stevens; Claude Messan Setodji; Erinn Herberman; Stephanie Ann Kovalchik; Katie Mugg; Meagan Cahill; Jessica Hwang; Joshua Lawrence Traub
发表日期2017-09-15
出版年2017
语种英语
结论

Measuring the Effects of Information-Sharing

  • Measuring the effects of information-sharing is not straightforward, because information is not being shared simply for the sake of sharing but with the intent of doing something else better. Many typical quantitative measures (e.g., amount of information shared by such systems) measure process or outputs, not necessarily the effect of sharing information.
  • We teamed up with the Automated Regional Justice Information System (ARJIS) to provide a real-world case study in which to experiment with measuring the effects of different types of data-sharing. As part of this effort, we interviewed users of ARJIS information-sharing tools in various roles and agencies to identify how the ways that criminal justice practitioners performed their tasks would shape the challenge of measuring the effect of information-sharing on their efficiency or effectiveness.
  • We also developed measures for three different types of sharing tools provided by ARJIS to its users. The measures examined the effect of ARJIS applications that made specific types of information more prominent for users, allowed sharing of information among groups of users, and offered tools to search cross-jurisdictional databases on the speed and likelihood of different law enforcement events, as well as the involvement of agencies with different jurisdictions in making arrests or managing specific types of offenders.
摘要

Information-sharing became a central element of the policy debate about U.S. homeland and national security after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. However, sharing of information across jurisdictional lines is just as important for everyday criminal justice efforts to prevent and investigate crime, and systems to provide such capabilities have been in place for many years. Despite widespread belief that information-sharing is valuable, there have been relatively limited efforts to measure its effect on criminal justice outcomes. To help address this need, we examined the measurement of information-sharing effects from the strategic to the tactical levels, with a focus on developing reliable measurements that capture the range of ways sharing can affect outcomes and how the practicalities of law enforcement work practices can affect measurement. In collaboration with an advanced regional information-sharing agency, we developed techniques to examine the effects of multiple types of data-sharing at the officer, case, and offender levels. Analyses showed significant correlations between different types of sharing on the level of interagency involvement in cases for individual offenders, on the timing and likelihood of specific law enforcement events, and on the likelihood of individual police officers to be involved in cross-jurisdictional arrests. In addition, we explored lessons for future policy evaluation and information system design to facilitate measurement.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    How Can We Measure the Effects of Information-Sharing?

  • Chapter Three

    Developing and Testing Measures with the Automated Regional Justice Information System

  • Chapter Four

    Conclusions

  • Appendix

    User Interview Questions

主题Criminal Justice ; Cyber and Data Sciences ; Law Enforcement
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2099.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523386
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Brian A. Jackson,Lane F. Burgette,Caroline Stevens,et al. Knowing More, But Accomplishing What? Developing Approaches to Measure the Effects of Information-Sharing on Criminal Justice Outcomes. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2099.pdf(1892KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1505479227656.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Brian A. Jackson]的文章
[Lane F. Burgette]的文章
[Caroline Stevens]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Brian A. Jackson]的文章
[Lane F. Burgette]的文章
[Caroline Stevens]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Brian A. Jackson]的文章
[Lane F. Burgette]的文章
[Caroline Stevens]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2099.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1505479227656.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。