G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2006
来源IDRR-2006-NAVY
Future Aircraft Carrier Options
Bradley Martin; Michael McMahon
发表日期2017-10-06
出版年2017
语种英语
结论

Each Variant Affects Force Sortie Generation

  • A CVN 8X, a descoped Ford-class carrier, offers similar warfighting capability to that of the Ford-class carrier.
  • A CVN LX offers an integrated, current air wing with capabilities near current levels but with less organic mission endurance for weapons and aviation fuel.
  • The CV LX, which is a version of the LHA 6 platforms, might be a low-risk, alternative pathway for the Navy to reduce carrier costs if such a variant were procured in greater numbers than the current carrier shipbuilding plan.
  • The smallest concept variant reviewed, the CV EX, does not provide either a significant capacity or an integrated air wing.

Each Variant Affects Cost

  • A CVN 8X might generate fewer sorties than the Ford class and might only incrementally reduce overall platform cost.
  • A CVN LX concept would allow considerable savings across the ship's service life.
  • A CV LX could potentially reduce overall construction costs if it allowed for reduced carrier numbers were reduced.
  • A CV EX is not practical at all without considerable revision of Navy warfighting concept of operations.
摘要

Although the integrated carrier air wing is the actual component of sea-based tactical aviation delivering warfighting capability for power projection, the individual air wings require aviation support for launch and recovery at tactical distances, fuel and flight crew replenishment, maintenance, and other sustainment. The aircraft carrier and embarked crew provide this support.

,

Some are concerned that continuing the current carrier program imposes high acquisition cost and might unduly affect the whole of the Navy shipbuilding budget. The Senate Armed Services Committee noted that alternatives could be developed for less cost and potentially with sufficient capability. This led to a request for the Navy to examine lower-cost alternatives.

,

This report is a shorter version of a classified, restricted-distribution report provided to the Navy in July 2016. Neither report is of a formal analysis of alternatives or detailed engineering study, nor is either a requirement document. It is an exploration of possible alternatives for further consideration to potentially replace the legacy force as it begins reaching expected service life in decades to come. The variants analyzed are possible alternatives and do not represent recommendations for a specific future course of action.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Operational Requirements

  • Chapter Three

    Aircraft Carrier Variants Considered

  • Chapter Four

    Assessing Operational Impact of Carrier Concept Variants

  • Chapter Five

    Platform Comparison Cost

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    U.S. Navy Forwarding Letters

  • Appendix B

    Details of the Nuclear-Powered Aircraft Carrier Mission-Essential Task List and Deployment Preparation

  • Appendix C

    Aircraft and Seacraft Mentioned

主题Aircraft Carriers ; Military Acquisition and Procurement ; United States Navy
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2006.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523406
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bradley Martin,Michael McMahon. Future Aircraft Carrier Options. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2006.pdf(2527KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1507291190160.jpg.p(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bradley Martin]的文章
[Michael McMahon]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bradley Martin]的文章
[Michael McMahon]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bradley Martin]的文章
[Michael McMahon]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2006.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1507291190160.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Wd2iABauuE.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。