G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2200
来源IDRR-2200-RC
After Brexit: Alternate forms of Brexit and their implications for the United Kingdom, the European Union and the United States
Charles P. Ries; Marco Hafner; Troy D. Smith; Frances G. Burwell; Daniel Egel; Eugeniu Han; Martin Stepanek; Howard J. Shatz
发表日期2017-12-11
出版年2017
页码159
语种英语
结论
  • The economic analysis shows that the UK will be economically worse-off outside of the EU under most plausible scenarios. The key question for the UK is how much worse-off it will be post-Brexit.
  • The option of leaving the EU with no deal and entering World Trade Organization (WTO) rules would lead to the greatest economic losses for the UK. This would reduce future GDP by around five per cent over ten years, which is a loss of $140 billion.
  • Under WTO rules, the EU would also lose out economically, but nowhere near the same proportion as the UK — about 0.7 per cent of its overall GDP, which is $97 billion.
  • Of all the scenarios analysed, the one that would have the most benefit would be a trilateral UK-EU-U.S. agreement, essentially a TTIP-like free-trade agreement. However, this is seen as very unlikely in the current political environment.
  • The U.S. will miss the influence and global perspective that the UK brings to the EU decision-making process, particularly around foreign policy, security and defence.
  • It will be important for the UK to move into a 'positive-sum game' in Brexit negotiations to ensure the best possible deal for all parties. Although the EU is likely to cooperate with the UK, it may see greater benefit in adopting a 'negative sum game'.
  • Overall, it is in the best interests of the UK, and to a lesser extent the EU, to work together to achieve some sort of trade deal post-Brexit.
摘要

Whether Brexit is judged to be success or not will depend to some degree on its economic impact. Much of the debate in the UK around Brexit has been focused on a 'hard' or 'soft Brexit', which relates to whether the UK should leave the Single Market and the Customs Union. However, there are a range of different trade opportunities and arrangements that could happen between the UK and European Union (EU), and other countries, such as the U.S., post-Brexit.

,

The chosen trade arrangement will largely depend on the UK's negotiations with the EU. This will involve a complex set of talks between both parties involving multiple issues. The Brexit negotiations appear to be particularly challenging for the UK, as it attempts to disentangle its current ties with the EU, while also negotiating arrangements for a future UK–EU trading relationship.

,

RAND explored eight plausible post-Brexit trade scenarios involving the UK, EU and U.S. after Brexit. Game theory insights were also used to create a better understanding of how a variety of factors might affect the outcome of Brexit negotiations.

,

The UK is likely to be economically worse-off outside of the EU under most plausible scenarios, particularly if the UK leaves the EU with no trade deal. It is in the UK's best interests to achieve some sort of open trading and investment relationship post-Brexit. The most beneficial trade scenario would be a trilateral UK-EU-US agreement, but this is seen as very unlikely in the current political environment.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Background to Brexit

  • Chapter Two

    Issues for negotiation

  • Chapter Three

    Examining Brexit negotiations: priorities of the various parties

  • Chapter Four

    Examining Brexit negotiations: implications from game theory

  • Chapter Five

    Estimating the economic effects of Brexit

  • Chapter Six

    US interests

  • Chapter Seven

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    EU27 country groupings

  • Appendix B

    Game theory examples

  • Appendix C

    Non-tariff costs over time

  • Appendix D

    Changes in trade flows

  • Appendix E

    Free trade agreements and foreign direct investment

  • Appendix F

    The effect of Brexit on FDI

  • Appendix G

    Foreign direct investment and economic growth

主题European Union ; International Economic Relations ; International Trade ; United Kingdom ; United States
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2200.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523455
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Charles P. Ries,Marco Hafner,Troy D. Smith,et al. After Brexit: Alternate forms of Brexit and their implications for the United Kingdom, the European Union and the United States. 2017.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2200.pdf(1339KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1513016010823.jpg.p(3KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Charles P. Ries]的文章
[Marco Hafner]的文章
[Troy D. Smith]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Charles P. Ries]的文章
[Marco Hafner]的文章
[Troy D. Smith]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Charles P. Ries]的文章
[Marco Hafner]的文章
[Troy D. Smith]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2200.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1513016010823.jpg.pagespeed.ic.pmw5fSkDhe.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。