G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2314
来源IDRR-2314-RC
Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life
Jennifer Kavanagh; Michael D. Rich
发表日期2018-01-16
出版年2018
语种英语
结论

What Is Truth Decay?

  • Truth Decay is defined as a set of four related trends: increasing disagreement about facts and analytical interpretations of facts and data; a blurring of the line between opinion and fact; an increase in the relative volume, and resulting influence, of opinion and personal experience over fact; and declining trust in formerly respected sources of factual information.

Is Truth Decay New?

  • This report explores three historical eras — the 1890s, 1920s, and 1960s — for evidence of the four Truth Decay trends and compares those eras with the past two decades (2000s–2010s). Two of the four trends occurred in earlier periods: the blurring of the line between opinion and fact and an increase in the relative volume, and resulting influence, of opinion over fact. Declining trust in institutions, while evident in previous eras, is more severe today. No evidence of an increase in disagreement about facts and analytical interpretations of facts and data was seen in the earlier periods.

What Causes Truth Decay?

  • Four drivers, or causes, of Truth Decay are described: cognitive bias, changes in the information system (including the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle), competing demands on the educational system that limit its ability to keep pace with changes in the information system, and political, sociodemographic, and economic polarization. Various agents also amplify Truth Decay's trends.

What Are the Consequences?

  • The consequences of Truth Decay manifest in many ways. The most damaging effects might be the erosion of civil discourse, political paralysis, alienation and disengagement of individuals from political and civic institutions, and uncertainty about U.S. policy.
摘要

Over the past two decades, national political and civil discourse in the United States has been characterized by "Truth Decay," defined as a set of four interrelated trends: an increasing disagreement about facts and analytical interpretations of facts and data; a blurring of the line between opinion and fact; an increase in the relative volume, and resulting influence, of opinion and personal experience over fact; and lowered trust in formerly respected sources of factual information. These trends have many causes, but this report focuses on four: characteristics of human cognitive processing, such as cognitive bias; changes in the information system, including social media and the 24-hour news cycle; competing demands on the education system that diminish time spent on media literacy and critical thinking; and polarization, both political and demographic. The most damaging consequences of Truth Decay include the erosion of civil discourse, political paralysis, alienation and disengagement of individuals from political and civic institutions, and uncertainty over national policy.

,

This report explores the causes and consequences of Truth Decay and how they are interrelated, and examines past eras of U.S. history to identify evidence of Truth Decay's four trends and observe similarities with and differences from the current period. It also outlines a research agenda, a strategy for investigating the causes of Truth Decay and determining what can be done to address its causes and consequences.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Truth Decay's Four Trends

  • Chapter Three

    Historical Context: Is Truth Decay New?

  • Chapter Four

    Drivers: What Is Causing Truth Decay?

  • Chapter Five

    The Consequences of Truth Decay

  • Chapter Six

    The Road to Solutions: A Research Agenda

  • Appendix

    Additional Information About Our Methodology

主题Civic Education ; Communities ; Data Science ; Media Literacy ; Politics and Government ; Social Media Analysis ; United States
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523472
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jennifer Kavanagh,Michael D. Rich. Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2314.pdf(2545KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1543324212997.jpg.p(8KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer Kavanagh]的文章
[Michael D. Rich]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer Kavanagh]的文章
[Michael D. Rich]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jennifer Kavanagh]的文章
[Michael D. Rich]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2314.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1543324212997.jpg.pagespeed.ic.vJQux-Fl17.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。