G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2367
来源IDRR-2367-DFT
Bus fare and journey time elasticities and diversion factors for all modes: A rapid evidence assessment
Fay Dunkerley; Mark Wardman; Charlene Rohr; Nils Fearnley
发表日期2018-07-09
出版年2018
页码108
语种英语
结论

Diversion factors have been derived from a substantial, but diverse, database.

  • A revised set of recommended diversion factors are presented for interventions on bus, car, rail, light rail/metro, cycle and walk. Further, best-estimate values for a number of scenarios that are considered to be useful for transport appraisal purposes are provided.

Very little new evidence on bus fare elasticities has been identified in the review.

  • We do not recommend any changes to the overall range of values for bus fare elasticities. However, based on the additional evidence from Wardman (2014), recommended values for area type and trip-purpose segmentations are presented.

We have uncovered very little new evidence on bus journey time elasticities.

  • We find that there is very little evidence on bus in-vehicle time (IVT) or generalised journey time (GJT) elasticities. We are not aware of any studies that determine GJT elasticities directly and the recommended values are derived from IVT elasticities.
摘要

This study uses a rapid-evidence review process to identify evidence on bus fare and journey time elasticities and diversion factors for all modes (diversion factors quantify the impact of changes on one mode on the demand for other modes and for new trips). It uses a systematic search procedure to identify relevant academic and grey literature through structured database searches, as well as making enquiries to experts in the field to identify material, such as unpublished studies. The study focuses on material produced in or that is relevant to the UK. Little recent evidence on bus fare elasticities (in the UK) — and little evidence on bus journey time elasticities generally — was identified in the systematic search process. However, a substantial database of diversion-factor evidence was identified and collated. Recommendations are provided, based on analysis of the available evidence. In general, we find that the evidence on diversion factors is very diverse, covering a wide range of mainly metropolitan geographies, trip purposes, journey types and alternative transport options.

目录 Bus fare and journey time elasticities and diversion factors for all modes: A rapid evidence assessment | RAND
主题Passenger Traffic ; Public Transportation ; Traffic ; Traffic Measurement ; Transportation Economics ; United Kingdom
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2367.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523577
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Fay Dunkerley,Mark Wardman,Charlene Rohr,et al. Bus fare and journey time elasticities and diversion factors for all modes: A rapid evidence assessment. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2367.pdf(1214KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1600186886940.jpg.p(2KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Fay Dunkerley]的文章
[Mark Wardman]的文章
[Charlene Rohr]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Fay Dunkerley]的文章
[Mark Wardman]的文章
[Charlene Rohr]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Fay Dunkerley]的文章
[Mark Wardman]的文章
[Charlene Rohr]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2367.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1600186886940.jpg.pagespeed.ic.Gt4e6V3ek_.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。