Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2476 |
来源ID | RR-2476-NCCIH |
Determining the Appropriateness of Spinal Manipulation and Mobilization for Chronic Neck Pain: Indications and Ratings by a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel | |
Ian D. Coulter; Margaret D. Whitley; Howard Vernon; Eric Hurwitz; Paul G. Shekelle; Patricia M. Herman | |
发表日期 | 2018-07-24 |
出版年 | 2018 |
页码 | 70 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | The methodology involved a literature review and panel assessments.
The panel rated 186 indications to assess the appropriateness of manipulation and mobilization for chronic neck pain.
|
摘要 | The approach developed by researchers at the RAND Corporation for assessing the appropriateness of health care makes it feasible to take the best of what is known from research and apply it — using the expertise of experienced clinicians — over the wide range of patients and health problems seen in real-world clinical practice. The major limitation of the RAND approach is that it utilizes a limited definition of appropriateness that that relies heavily on safety, efficacy, and effectiveness. This report, which focuses on appropriateness of indications for spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic neck pain, presents results from one part of a broader study designed to develop a methodology to integrate patient-reported outcomes, patient preferences, and cost into the appropriateness panel process. It describes the results and methodology of convened panels of neck pain experts who met to discuss and rate appropriateness of 186 indications for spinal manipulation and mobilization for chronic neck pain, and serves four objectives: (1) Describe the methodology of the process of obtaining appropriateness ratings that can be used later to calculate rates of appropriate care and can be replicated by other studies; (2) provide the list of actual indications used in this study so that future studies can use them or adapt them without going through the extensive and costly process we did; (3) provide further data on the modified Delphi process for generating consensus by exploring whether ratings of appropriateness changed between rounds and whether agreement or disagreement went up after panelists met face to face; and (4) present final ratings of the appropriateness of manipulation and mobilization for neck pain for 186 indications. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Chronic Diseases and Conditions ; Evidence Based Health Practice ; Measuring Health Care Costs ; Pain Management |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2476.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523592 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ian D. Coulter,Margaret D. Whitley,Howard Vernon,et al. Determining the Appropriateness of Spinal Manipulation and Mobilization for Chronic Neck Pain: Indications and Ratings by a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR2476.pdf(1188KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1532433880115.jpg.p(2KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。