G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1789
来源IDRR-1789-AF
Evaluation of the Strength Aptitude Test and Other Fitness Tests to Qualify Air Force Recruits for Physically Demanding Specialties
Sean Robson; Stephanie Pezard; Maria C. Lytell; Carra S. Sims; John E. Boon; Jr.; Jason Michel Etchegaray; Michael W. Robbins; David Schulker; Jerry M. Sollinger; Jason H. Campbell; et al.
发表日期2018-08-10
出版年2018
语种英语
结论

The SAT still has good predictive validity but could be augmented with other fitness tests.

  • The majority of Air Force Career Field Managers (CFMs) who responded to a survey are satisfied with the current SAT requirements for the AFSCs they manage.
  • Available measures are largely insufficient for conducting the statistical tests needed to evaluate the relationships between SAT scores, performance, and injuries.
  • Analysis indicates that adding the Arm Endurance test to the SAT adds the most validity of any test.
  • Analyses consistently found support for the predictive validity of the SAT and the related fitness tests evaluated in the study.
摘要

The Air Force uses the Strength Aptitude Test (SAT) to determine whether recruits meet the fitness levels needed to perform the duties of various Air Force specialties with physical strength requirements. However, the SAT was developed in the early 1980s and has not been revalidated since then. In the interim, the duties associated with many Air Force Specialty Code classifications may have changed, and new ones have been added. These changes require a reevaluation of the SAT's utility and effectiveness for qualifying recruits into these specialties. This report evaluates the status and validity of the SAT in a series of studies and summarizes the studies RAND has completed independently and one study conducted in conjunction with HumRRO, which provided the additional data necessary to develop some courses of action for the Air Force to follow to ensure airmen can meet job-related physical requirements.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Manager Views of Benefits and Challenges of SAT

  • Chapter Three

    The Validity of SAT Scores

  • Chapter Four

    Evaluating the SAT and Related Fitness Tests Using Physical Task Simulations

  • Chapter Five

    What are the Physical Requirements to Perform in Different AFSCs?

  • Chapter Six

    Summary of Criterion-Related Validation Study

  • Chapter Seven

    Courses of Action and Implementation

  • Appendix A

    Survey of CFMs on the SAT

  • Appendix B

    Email Recruiting Volunteers for Pre-Test

  • Appendix C

    Numbers of Airmen and AFSCs that Participated in the Pre-Test (April 15, 2015)

  • Appendix D

    Emails Recruiting Volunteers for Reliability and Validation Studies

  • Appendix E

    Email sent to Subject-Matter Experts to Identify Physically Demanding Tasks

  • Appendix F

    Physical Task Matrix

  • Appendix G

    Movement Classification Questionnaire (MCQ)

  • Appendix H

    List of AFSCs Interviewed by the RAND Team

  • Appendix I

    Survey Items

  • Appendix J

    Additional Information About HumRRO's Criterion-Related Validation Study Efforts

  • Appendix K

    Technical Background for Additional RAND Analyses

主题Gender Equity in the Workplace ; Gender Integration in the Military ; Military Career Field Management ; Military Recruitment ; Occupational Safety and Health ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1789.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523600
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sean Robson,Stephanie Pezard,Maria C. Lytell,et al. Evaluation of the Strength Aptitude Test and Other Fitness Tests to Qualify Air Force Recruits for Physically Demanding Specialties. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1789.pdf(1615KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1533932723845.jpg.p(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sean Robson]的文章
[Stephanie Pezard]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sean Robson]的文章
[Stephanie Pezard]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sean Robson]的文章
[Stephanie Pezard]的文章
[Maria C. Lytell]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1789.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1533932723845.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0ToQiryFd-.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。