G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2617
来源IDRR-2617-AF
Supplemental Career Paths for Air Force Pilots: A Warrant Officer Component or an Aviation Technical Track?
Albert A. Robbert; Michael G. Mattock; Beth J. Asch; John S. Crown; James Hosek; Tara L. Terry
发表日期2018-08-14
出版年2018
语种英语
结论

Because the fundamental objective of either supplemental path is to enhance retention, particularly when demand for commercial pilots is high, the ATT is clearly favored.

  • Both alternatives would yield modest cost savings, and both would present risks yet to be fully evaluated. Not least significant is that a WO program would require development and management of new processes and policies across the personnel life cycle — recruiting, accessions, compensation, retention, utilization, promotion, and transition. An ATT would require much less sweeping adjustments, most of which would be managed through creation of a new competitive category.
摘要

This report documents analyses to help the U.S. Air Force Director of Military Force Management Policy respond to a request from congressional staff to consider reimplementation of a warrant officer (WO) program in the Air Force, specifically to fill pilot requirements, or an alternative, an aviation technical track (ATT) for commissioned officers (COs). Either alternative would supplement the traditional pilot career path in a manner intended to enhance force sustainment and thus help to reduce pilot shortages at least cost. Only one alternative — the ATT — was found likely to achieve this objective.

,

Any shift in management of the Air Force's pilot workforce must be evaluated with consideration of its centrality to the Air Force's core missions and the difficulty of keeping pilot production, absorption, retention, and overall inventory sustainment in balance. Pilot production and absorption are difficult to expand and are often constrained below levels needed to meet requirements. Retention is very sensitive to extrinsic factors, particularly major airline hiring.

,

This report draws from RAND Project AIR FORCE capabilities and existing pilot models. In brief, the authors found that structural considerations would permit either a WO component or an ATT of the officer pilot force, sized at about 1,000 pilots out of a total requirement of a little under 13,000. Most importantly, the WO option would be expected to reduce pilot retention, while the ATT would be expected to increase it. Cost considerations, although minor, are favorable for both alternatives. Both present risks that merit more consideration than were possible in the analyses yet performed.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    A Warrant Officer Component

  • Chapter Three

    An Aviation Technical Track

  • Chapter Four

    Conclusions

主题Military Career Field Management ; Military Compensation ; Military Officers ; Military Personnel Retention ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2617.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523601
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Albert A. Robbert,Michael G. Mattock,Beth J. Asch,et al. Supplemental Career Paths for Air Force Pilots: A Warrant Officer Component or an Aviation Technical Track?. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2617.pdf(678KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1534257040460.jpg.p(2KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Albert A. Robbert]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Albert A. Robbert]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Albert A. Robbert]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2617.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1534257040460.jpg.pagespeed.ic.MSNtfyTlkU.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。