G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR1681
来源IDRR-1681-A
Sectarianism in the Middle East: Implications for the United States
Heather M. Robinson; Ben Connable; David E. Thaler; Ali G. Scotten
发表日期2018-08-30
出版年2018
语种英语
结论

Sectarian conflict is more political and social than purely religious.

  • The drivers of conflict between the Sunnis and the Shi'a are mostly political in nature, and political and social contexts inform the primacy of sectarian identity and the prevalence of sectarianism.

Sectarianism is a two-pronged phenomenon: internal and external sectarianism.

  • Internal sectarianism is sectarian conflict or rhetoric on an intrastate level.
  • External sectarianism takes place on an interstate level and involves a sectarian actor's encouragement of sectarian divisions in foreign countries for its own political purposes.

Sectarianism may not be the most important way to understand regional conflict, which can look solely sectarian in its most simplified form.

  • The Sunnis and the Shi'a are not monolithic blocs — there is considerable intrasect discord and violence — so, viewing regional conflict through a strictly sectarian lens could be a major pitfall for policymakers.

Sectarianism varies between countries and regions, and it manifests itself differently in different places.

  • Iraq has long been considered a sectarian state, and conflict over the appropriate representation in government along sectarian lines seems to be the primary driver of conflict.
  • Although Iraq suffers from lasting sectarian divisions and a strong argument can be made that sectarian identity will continue to be decisive in Iraqi politics, there is nothing inherently intractable or immutable about the problem.
  • It would be simplistic to refer to sectarian identity as the main source of the Syrian uprising against Bashar al-Assad or as the sole motivator of continuing violence.
摘要

Present unrest in the Middle East has many causes and takes on many forms. A collective sense of disenfranchisement, inadequate governance, geopolitical discord, and religious extremism all contribute to the conflicts in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, and Libya. Many Western observers and policymakers view unrest in the Middle East through the lens of binary religious sectarianism, focusing on the divisions between Sunni and Shi'a Muslims. This split is most clearly articulated in the geopolitical competition between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and it plays out through violence in Iraq and Syria. But the complexities of human identity and of regional culture and history do not lend themselves to this arguably too-simplistic interpretation of the situation. The authors analyze sectarianism in the region, evaluate other factors that fan the flames of violent conflict, and suggest a different interpretation of both identity and the nature of regional unrest.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    The History of Sectarianism in the Middle East

  • Chapter Three

    Sectarianism in Iraq

  • Chapter Four

    Sectarianism in Syria

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusion and Policy Implications

主题Al Qaida ; Iraq ; The Islamic State (Terrorist Organization) ; Religion ; Syria ; United States
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1681.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523608
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Heather M. Robinson,Ben Connable,David E. Thaler,et al. Sectarianism in the Middle East: Implications for the United States. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR1681.pdf(1427KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1594749211893.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Heather M. Robinson]的文章
[Ben Connable]的文章
[David E. Thaler]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Heather M. Robinson]的文章
[Ben Connable]的文章
[David E. Thaler]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Heather M. Robinson]的文章
[Ben Connable]的文章
[David E. Thaler]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR1681.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1594749211893.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。