全球智库信息集成服务系统

Usage and operation of New Mexico's online intake system

• During the eight-month evaluation, usage of the online intake system was relatively low. Examining intakes conducted by New Mexico's two largest civil legal aid agencies indicated that 13 percent and 2 percent, respectively, of their intakes came through the online system.
• Analyses indicate that clients who initiated intake through the online system had their cases treated similarly to cases initiated through traditional routes, although they tended to take a few extra days to resolve.

Implementation issues with New Mexico's online intake system

• Applicant information from the online intake system did not feed directly into the civil legal aid agencies' case management systems.
• Many individuals who initiated intake through the online system did not complete the intake process (which required them to complete intake through a phone call during regular business hours).
• These implementation issues suggest the online system did not increase intake efficiency during our eight-month evaluation.

How does the online system affect access to justice?

• A relatively small fraction of online applicants were new users who would not have been able to access legal aid without the online intake option.
• Due to contemporaneous staffing declines, this evaluation could not identify how the number of individuals receiving services changed in response to the implementation of the online intake system. However, because there was no real improvement in intake efficiency during the period evaluated, it is unrealistic to expect to see any real change in the number of individuals overall who receive service.

Online intake systems for civil legal aid might affect access to justice in two ways: (1) allowing individuals who would not otherwise have access because they cannot use traditional intake methods to access civil legal aid and (2) allowing legal aid agencies to increase intake efficiency, thereby allowing them to serve more individuals overall with the same resources. To better assess the effects online intake systems might have in practice, researchers conducted an evaluation of the online intake system for civil legal aid that New Mexico implemented in April 2016.

Staff interviews, as well as analyses of administrative data, identified several implementation issues that indicate that the online intake system likely did not result in efficiency gains in the intake process during the eight-month period the researchers evaluated. Usage of the online system was also low. Survey results indicate that a relatively small fraction of online applicants were new users who would not have been able to access legal aid without the online intake option.

Due to contemporaneous staffing declines, this evaluation could not identify how the number of individuals receiving services changed in response to the implementation of the online intake system. However, because there was no real improvement in intake efficiency during this period, it is unrealistic to expect to see any real change in the number of individuals overall that receive service. Because the evaluation examined a short period after implementation, it is possible that the usage and efficiency of the system will increase as the system matures.

• Chapter One

  Introduction

• Chapter Two

  The Triage and Intake Process at Baseline

• Chapter Three

  The Implementation of the Online Intake System

• Chapter Four

  Quantitative Data

• Chapter Five

  The Impacts of New Mexico's Online Intake System

• Chapter Six

  Conclusion

• Appendix A

  Sample Restrictions and Matching Process for Administrative Data

• Appendix B

  Surveys