G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2403
来源IDRR-2403-NAVY
Naval Operational Supply System: Analysis of Alternatives
Bradley Wilson; Jessie Riposo; Thomas Goughnour; Mel Eisman; Angelena Bohman; Shane Tierney; Rachel M. Burns
发表日期2018-10-11
出版年2018
页码59
语种英语
结论

Commercial-off-the-shelf software is the best choice for going forward

  • The AoA specified four alternative areas — Status Quo, Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS), Government-Off-the-Shelf (GOTS), and Hybrid (some combination of the other three) — and examined nine possible alternative options.
  • The Navy has several viable options, with Alternatives 3 (COTS), 8 (Hybrid Optimize Commercial with Status Quo of Food Service Management and Retail Operations Management systems), and 9 (Hybrid Forward Compatible Commercial) offering the best performance and the lowest cost, schedule, and performance risks. Within the COTS alternative, there are many potential providers.
  • The risk-adjusted cost estimates for the COTS alternatives (3, 8, and 9) vary significantly. The higher estimates are nearly twice the cost of the lower estimates, with a spread of more than $200 million. This cost range reflects risk and the variety of integrators and vendors available.
摘要

The U.S. Navy operates a 276-vessel battle force, in which each vessel requires a number of supplies for the care and feeding of the crew, the maintenance of the ship, shore-based operations, and operational effectiveness. The Navy uses 16 core information systems to help it manage afloat supply operations for the force. It has indicated that its disparate, antiquated systems have reliability, supportability, maintainability, and affordability problems. Other issues identified relate to the inability to have enterprise visibility into supply operations, cybersecurity demands, and challenges associated with meeting Financial Independent Auditability Review goals. To address these capability gaps in the existing portfolio of systems and to assist in modernizing them, the Department of the Navy asked the RAND Corporation to help in conducting an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) of its future operational supply, food service, and retail operations capability, known as the Naval Operational Supply System. The study team relied on a series of qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate the effectiveness, costs, and risks of proposed alternatives within a six-month period of performance.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Alternatives Selected and the Process of Refining Them

  • Chapter Three

    Effectiveness Analysis Results

  • Chapter Four

    Cost Analysis Results

  • Chapter Five

    Risk Analysis Results

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusions

主题Combat Service Support ; Military Acquisition and Procurement ; Military Information Technology Systems ; Military Ships and Naval Vessels ; Supply Chain Management ; United States Navy
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2403.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523650
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bradley Wilson,Jessie Riposo,Thomas Goughnour,et al. Naval Operational Supply System: Analysis of Alternatives. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2403.pdf(1829KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1540468312564.jpg.p(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bradley Wilson]的文章
[Jessie Riposo]的文章
[Thomas Goughnour]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bradley Wilson]的文章
[Jessie Riposo]的文章
[Thomas Goughnour]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bradley Wilson]的文章
[Jessie Riposo]的文章
[Thomas Goughnour]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2403.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1540468312564.jpg.pagespeed.ic.lgrd7fl9Kw.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。