G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2628
来源IDRR-2628-WODC
Counterterrorism evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead
Jacopo Bellasio; Joanna Hofman; Antonia Ward; Fook Nederveen; Anna Knack; Arya Sofia Meranto; Stijn Hoorens
发表日期2018-10-24
出版年2018
页码169
语种英语
结论
  • The scope, purpose and activities characterising CT have evolved in recent years in parallel with the growth of the PCVE field. This is both a response to changes in the threat landscape and a result of a growing understanding of terrorism and violent extremism. Dutch authorities have designed and implemented a wide array of CT and PCVE legislation and measures, in recognition of the need for an approach that goes beyond traditional CT measures.
  • The study produced an inventory comprising of 48 CT and PCVE evaluations manuscripts (38 in English, 6 in Dutch and 4 in German). These were analysed through an analytical framework to identify trends, patterns and characteristics of CT and PCVE evaluation.
  • When compared with results from previous reviews, results from this study suggest that a growing volume of CT and PCVE evaluations is being undertaken and that the majority of these rely on primary data from multiple sources, perspectives and methods. Nonetheless, there appear to be limits to the extent to which evaluation practice has advanced and grown evenly across all areas of CT and PCVE work as significant gaps and shortcomings continue to mar a number of evaluations (e.g. evaluations characterised by designs that undermine their ability to draw robust conclusions about an initiative's impact).
  • A number of issues and challenges continue to mar evaluations in the fields of CT and PCVE, not all of them are exclusive to these fields. Lessons and reflections identified from evaluations reviewed pertain to: (i) inherent complexities of the fields of CT and PCVE; (ii) challenges associated with measuring real-world phenomena; (iii) challenges associated with existing evaluation designs; (iv) practical difficulties of conducting evaluations; and (v) drawbacks and benefits of specific evaluation methods.
摘要

In 2010, a study commissioned by the Research and Documentation Centre (Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum, WODC) in the Netherlands first aimed to assess evaluation practice and culture in the fields of counterterrorism (CT) and preventing and countering violent extremism (PCVE). Seven years on from this initial study, in light of the continuous developments and investments occurring in the fields of CT and PCVE, there was a growing necessity for a renewed analysis of how strategies, policies and initiatives in these fields are evaluated and what advances could be made.

,

Mindful of this, in December 2017 the WODC commissioned RAND Europe to conduct a study aimed at investigating how evaluations of CT and PCVE policies in the Netherlands and abroad have been designed and conducted over the last five years, and what practical lessons can be drawn regarding such evaluations.

,

To achieve this goal, the study entailed the undertaking of three interconnected research tasks. First, the study opened with the production of an inventory of evaluations of CT and PCVE strategies, policies and interventions conducted since 1 January 2013. In parallel to this, the study team developed an analytical framework to be used for assessing evaluations collected. Lastly, the study team conducted a structured analysis and review of the evaluations inventory.

,

This report discusses the activities, results and findings of this study and presents recommendations for future work in this area. It is aimed at a specialist audience of academics, practitioners and policy-makers with an intimate understanding of evaluation, particularly in the context of CT and PCVE.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Methodology

  • Chapter Three

    Understanding the study context and its key definitions

  • Chapter Four

    Building an analytical framework

  • Chapter Five

    Analysing CT and PCVE evaluations

  • Chapter Six

    Identifying issues and learning lessons from CT and PCVE evaluations

  • Chapter Seven

    Overall conclusions and recommendations

  • Annex A

    CT and PCVE evaluations inventory

  • Annex B

    Methodology

  • Annex C

    Stakeholder elicitation details and tools

  • Annex D

    Analytical framework

主题Counterterrorism ; Crime and Violence Prevention ; Domestic Terrorism ; Netherlands ; Program Evaluation ; Violent Extremism
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2628.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523658
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jacopo Bellasio,Joanna Hofman,Antonia Ward,et al. Counterterrorism evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2628.pdf(1446KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1600199988482.jpg(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jacopo Bellasio]的文章
[Joanna Hofman]的文章
[Antonia Ward]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jacopo Bellasio]的文章
[Joanna Hofman]的文章
[Antonia Ward]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jacopo Bellasio]的文章
[Joanna Hofman]的文章
[Antonia Ward]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2628.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1600199988482.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。