G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2623
来源IDRR-2623-NTP
Validation Study of the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric
Andrew McEachin; Jonathan Schweig; Rachel Perera; Isaac M. Opper
发表日期2018-11-07
出版年2018
页码45
语种英语
结论
  • Relationships between teachers' TNTP Core scores and student achievement gains are modest and vary by subject area.
  • Observers often disagree in their ratings of instructional practice based on the TNTP Core rubric, and these disagreements may be related to their content expertise.
  • There is a considerable amount of uncertainty about the extent to which TNTP Core scores represent teachers' overall instructional practices.
摘要

Nearly every public school teacher in the United States receives some form of feedback based on classroom observations, and these assessments are used by policymakers and administrators as indicators of teacher quality and input for professional development purposes. The TNTP Core Teaching Rubric, introduced in 2014, is unlike others in that it is scored based on student behavior rather than teacher actions. In this report, RAND researchers assess whether the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric produces scores that are representative of teachers' overall instructional practices and whether raters' content expertise influence scores on TNTP Core.

,

For this study, volunteer teachers of mathematics and English language arts (ELA) from more than 20 districts or charter school networks across eight states had their classroom instruction videotaped three times. This sample was complemented with a sample of approximately 100 4th-and 5th-grade teachers drawn from the Measures of Effective Teaching study for whom videotaped instruction was available. Raters trained in the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric then scored the videos from both samples. Analyzing the raters' scores, RAND researchers found a modest relationship between teachers' TNTP Core scores and student achievement gains in ELA, and no statistically or practically significant relationships between TNTP Core scores and math achievement gains. Further, raters struggled to agree on their judgments about the quality of a lesson, suggesting a considerable amount of uncertainty about the extent to which TNTP Core scores represent teachers' overall instructional practices. The report includes a number of recommendations to improve the use of TNTP Core.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Design of Study

  • Chapter Three

    Methods

  • Chapter Four

    Consistency, Bias, and Reliability

  • Chapter Five

    Extrapolation and Predictive Validity

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusion and Recommendations

  • Chapter Seven

    Limitations

主题Academic Achievement ; Students ; Value-Added Modeling in Education
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2623.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523675
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Andrew McEachin,Jonathan Schweig,Rachel Perera,et al. Validation Study of the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2623.pdf(498KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1543954311967.jpg(3KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Andrew McEachin]的文章
[Jonathan Schweig]的文章
[Rachel Perera]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Andrew McEachin]的文章
[Jonathan Schweig]的文章
[Rachel Perera]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Andrew McEachin]的文章
[Jonathan Schweig]的文章
[Rachel Perera]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2623.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1543954311967.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。