Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2623 |
来源ID | RR-2623-NTP |
Validation Study of the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric | |
Andrew McEachin; Jonathan Schweig; Rachel Perera; Isaac M. Opper | |
发表日期 | 2018-11-07 |
出版年 | 2018 |
页码 | 45 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 |
|
摘要 | Nearly every public school teacher in the United States receives some form of feedback based on classroom observations, and these assessments are used by policymakers and administrators as indicators of teacher quality and input for professional development purposes. The TNTP Core Teaching Rubric, introduced in 2014, is unlike others in that it is scored based on student behavior rather than teacher actions. In this report, RAND researchers assess whether the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric produces scores that are representative of teachers' overall instructional practices and whether raters' content expertise influence scores on TNTP Core. ,For this study, volunteer teachers of mathematics and English language arts (ELA) from more than 20 districts or charter school networks across eight states had their classroom instruction videotaped three times. This sample was complemented with a sample of approximately 100 4th-and 5th-grade teachers drawn from the Measures of Effective Teaching study for whom videotaped instruction was available. Raters trained in the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric then scored the videos from both samples. Analyzing the raters' scores, RAND researchers found a modest relationship between teachers' TNTP Core scores and student achievement gains in ELA, and no statistically or practically significant relationships between TNTP Core scores and math achievement gains. Further, raters struggled to agree on their judgments about the quality of a lesson, suggesting a considerable amount of uncertainty about the extent to which TNTP Core scores represent teachers' overall instructional practices. The report includes a number of recommendations to improve the use of TNTP Core. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Academic Achievement ; Students ; Value-Added Modeling in Education |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2623.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523675 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Andrew McEachin,Jonathan Schweig,Rachel Perera,et al. Validation Study of the TNTP Core Teaching Rubric. 2018. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR2623.pdf(498KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
1543954311967.jpg(3KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | ![]() 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。