G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2610.1
来源IDRR-2610/1-RS
Evidence synthesis on measuring the distribution of benefits of research and innovation
Susan Guthrie; Camilla d'Angelo; Becky Ioppolo; Yulia Shenderovich; Gordon R. McInroy
发表日期2018-12-14
出版年2018
页码116
语种英语
结论
  • Existing evidence shows significant returns from R&D investment, estimated to be in the region of 20–30%. Although the existing evidence provides a compelling case for the benefits that R&I can deliver, there are numerous benefits from R&I that are not well measured or, in many cases, not well understood. These include benefits to culture, public engagement, social cohesion and the environment, amongst others.
  • Methodologically most evaluations of the benefits from R&I are dominated by a few methods, notably total factor productivity-based economic analyses, case studies, and portfolio-specific evaluations. We also note that the potential of some key datasets is not being realised.
  • Economic analyses are a useful approach that can be used to measure and characterise the benefits of investment in R&I. However, many of the benefits from R&I are not easily monetised, and there are numerous benefits from R&I that are not yet well measured or, in some cases, fully understood.
  • There is limited evidence on the distribution of impacts of R&I by region or population groups and over time.
  • There are examples of novel practice in the literature, as well as useful and underutilised datasets both within and beyond the R&I space, which could help develop a more comprehensive, nuanced picture of the range of benefits of R&I in the UK.
摘要

The UK government has committed to increase research and development (R&D) spending to 2.4% of GDP by 2027, with a long-term goal of 3%. Existing evidence shows significant returns from R&D investment, estimated to be in the region of 20–30%. Although the existing evidence provides a compelling case for the benefits that research and innovation (R&I) can deliver, there are numerous benefits from R&I that are not well measured by economic approaches or, in many cases, not well understood. These include benefits to culture, public engagement, social cohesion and the environment, amongst others.

,

RAND Europe conducted an evidence synthesis to characterise the range and nature of benefits resulting from research, how these can be measured, gaps in the existing evidence and how they might be addressed. Our review and evidence synthesis found that economic analyses are a useful approach that can be used to measure and characterise some of the benefits of investment in R&I. However, many of the benefits from R&I are not easily monetised, and there are numerous benefits from R&I that are not yet well captured or fully understood. There is also limited evidence on the distribution of impacts of R&I by region or population groups and over time. There are examples of novel practice in the literature, as well as useful and underutilised datasets both within and beyond the R&I space, which could help develop a more comprehensive, nuanced picture of the range of benefits of R&I in the UK.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    What are the benefits of R&I?

  • Chapter Three

    Mapping existing evidence and methods for capturing the benefits of research and innovation

  • Chapter Four

    Discussion and conclusions

  • Appendix A

    Methods

  • Appendix B

    Review of existing frameworks for assessing the benefits of R&I

主题Biomedical Research ; Biotechnology ; Science of Science ; Science ; Technology ; and Innovation Policy ; United Kingdom
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2610z1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523715
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Susan Guthrie,Camilla d'Angelo,Becky Ioppolo,et al. Evidence synthesis on measuring the distribution of benefits of research and innovation. 2018.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2610z1.pdf(1697KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1600199890740.jpg(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Susan Guthrie]的文章
[Camilla d'Angelo]的文章
[Becky Ioppolo]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Susan Guthrie]的文章
[Camilla d'Angelo]的文章
[Becky Ioppolo]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Susan Guthrie]的文章
[Camilla d'Angelo]的文章
[Becky Ioppolo]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2610z1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1600199890740.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。