G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2678
来源IDRR-2678-THIS
Patient and public involvement in research: Enabling meaningful contributions
Sarah Ball; Amelia Harshfield; Asha Carpenter; Adam Bertscher; Sonja Marjanovic
发表日期2019-02-14
出版年2019
页码94
语种英语
结论

Motivations for involvement

  • Patients and the public engage with research for a variety of reasons spanning: (i) interest in a healthcare topic, often driven by personal experience of a disease or of the health service; (ii) altruistic motivations to contribute to a better healthcare system through research; (iii) a desire to influence and reflect patient perspectives in research; and (iv) a more general interest in research activity and in contributing to scientific knowledge.

Approaches to involvement

  • PPI in health research can take place across different stages of a research cycle and at the level of an individual project, a portfolio of projects or at the organisational level. The duration, frequency or regularity of patient and public engagement can range from ad hoc, task-based contributions to long-term engagement across the lifetime of a project or research organisation.

Challenges, enablers and impacts

  • Challenges to effective PPI in research relate to governance and management issues, the capacity of individuals to engage, administrative challenges and challenges related to culture, values and attitudes. However, the growing focus on and increased commitment to PPI within research over the past decade has also revealed some key enabling mechanisms and rewards (e.g. feedback on contributions and on project progress and impacts; acknowledgment and recognition of contributions; learning and personal development opportunities).
  • The core categories of potential or realised impact from PPI in research span impacts on individuals (e.g. empowerment, influence), on research quality and relevance and on the wider research system (e.g. accountability for resource-use).
摘要

In recent years, we have seen an expansion of patient and public involvement (PPI) activities in research. This has been accompanied by a growing interest in understanding how PPI can best be mobilised and enabled, and in how it can contribute positively to the research process and to impacts from it. The body of literature on these issues has expanded rapidly in the last decade. However, the evidence base on what works, how and why remains fragmented and inconclusive.

,

RAND Europe was commissioned by The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute at the University of Cambridge to conduct a rapid review of the evidence base on PPI in research. This report reflects on what we know and on knowledge gaps. It aims to help inform THIS Institute's efforts to establish and implement an effective PPI strategy. It should also be of relevance to other organisations and initiatives seeking to involve patients and the public in research in a meaningful and effective way.

,

Based on a rapid evidence assessment and interviews with experts, the report examines why and how patients and the public get involved with research, what enables meaningful involvement, associated challenges and potential enabling mechanisms, the impact of PPI, and the evaluation of this activity. Based on these insights, we provide a series of recommendations for THIS Institute and other organisations to inform strategies for engaging patients and the public.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Background and context

  • Chapter Two

    Profile of the reviewed literature

  • Chapter Three

    Why does patient and public involvement in research happen?

  • Chapter Four

    How patients and the public are involved in research: an overview of approaches and methods

  • Chapter Five

    How can effective contributions from patient and public involvement be enabled?

  • Chapter Six

    What are the challenges and barriers to patient and public involvement with research?

  • Chapter Seven

    The impacts of patient and public involvement in research: what we know and what we do not know

  • Chapter Eight

    Reflection on key learning points and areas for consideration in future practice

  • Appendix A

    Examples of patient and public involvement in practice

  • Appendix B

    Study design and methods

主题Biomedical Research ; Medical Professionals ; Patient Experience ; Survey Research Methodology
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2678.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523737
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sarah Ball,Amelia Harshfield,Asha Carpenter,et al. Patient and public involvement in research: Enabling meaningful contributions. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2678.pdf(1035KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1550166877073.jpg.p(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sarah Ball]的文章
[Amelia Harshfield]的文章
[Asha Carpenter]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sarah Ball]的文章
[Amelia Harshfield]的文章
[Asha Carpenter]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sarah Ball]的文章
[Amelia Harshfield]的文章
[Asha Carpenter]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2678.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1550166877073.jpg.pagespeed.ic.LW1nSFFg83.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。