G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2415
来源IDRR-2415-AF
The Relative Cost-Effectiveness of Retaining Versus Accessing Air Force Pilots
Michael G. Mattock; Beth J. Asch; James Hosek; Michael Boito
发表日期2019-03-27
出版年2019
语种英语
结论

Training cost per basic qualified pilot is generally quite high

  • The cost of training a basic qualified fighter pilot ranges from $5.6 million for an F 16 pilot to $10.9 million for an F 22 pilot. Bomber pilot training cost is also high, ranging from $7.3 million for a B 1 pilot to $9.7 million for a B 52 pilot. Transport and mobility pilot training cost is somewhat lower, ranging from $1.1 million for a C 17 pilot to $2.5 million for a C 130J pilot. Training cost per pilot for command, control, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations (e.g., the RC 135) is about $5.5 million.

Retaining pilots is more efficient than accessing new ones

  • For each of the pilot specialties considered, increasing AvB to increase retention was more efficient than expanding the training pipeline to sustain a given pilot inventory, over the range of AvB amounts considered.
  • Were pilot training cost lower — $1 million, in the case of fighter pilots — per capita cost would not continue to decline as AvB increases, and, in fact, the efficient level of AvB would be $40,000 per year of additional commitment.
  • It is efficient to increase the AvB cap to at least $100,000 to retain midcareer fighter pilots in the steady state.
  • The share of pilots who are experienced is larger in the early transition years, when S&I pays, rather than the size of the training pipeline, are increased, although the experience mix of pilots is more senior in the steady state.
摘要

An alternative to relying on retaining current pilots to sustain the size of the U.S. Air Force's (USAF's) pilot force is to access and train new pilots. But expanding the pilot training pipeline is costly, so, ultimately, the USAF faces a trade-off between increasing pilot accessions and incurring greater training cost or increasing pilot retention and incurring higher special and incentive (S&I) pay costs, as well as the higher personnel cost of a more senior force. For a given-size pilot force, the determination of the efficient level of S&I pays and whether it is more cost-effective to train new pilots or retain those already in the force depends on the cost of training; personnel costs, including the cost of S&I pays; and, importantly, how responsive pilot retention behavior is to increases in Aviation Bonus (AvB) and Aviation Incentive Pay (AvIP).

,

To ensure that AvB and AvIP use USAF resources efficiently to sustain the pilot force, the USAF asked RAND Project AIR FORCE to develop an analytic capability for determining the efficient amount of S&I pays for a rated officer career field given the cost of producing an additional trained and adequately experienced rated officer, as well as the retention behavior of rated officers. This report summarizes the analysis in response to this request. The authors recommend that the USAF explore where training cost savings might be found (e.g., perhaps through alternative training technologies) without jeopardizing USAF capability and readiness.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Conceptual Trade-Off Between Retaining Pilots and Expanding the Training Pipeline

  • Chapter Three

    The Cost of Training Pilots

  • Chapter Four

    Dynamic Retention Model Overview, Estimates, and Model Fits

  • Chapter Five

    Results

  • Chapter Six

    Concluding Thoughts

主题Military Compensation ; Military Education and Training ; Military Personnel Retention ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2415.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523768
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michael G. Mattock,Beth J. Asch,James Hosek,et al. The Relative Cost-Effectiveness of Retaining Versus Accessing Air Force Pilots. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2415.pdf(1049KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1553692820109.jpg.p(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[James Hosek]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[James Hosek]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[James Hosek]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2415.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1553692820109.jpg.pagespeed.ic.LYL8ReBMs5.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。