Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR3063 |
来源ID | RR-3063-A |
Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground | |
James Dobbins; Raphael S. Cohen; Nathan Chandler; Bryan Frederick; Edward Geist; Paul DeLuca; Forrest E. Morgan; Howard J. Shatz; Brent Williams | |
发表日期 | 2019-04-24 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Russia's weaknesses lie in the economic domains
The most promising measures to stress Russia are in the realms of energy production and international pressure
Geopolitical measures to bait Russia into overextending itself are likely impractical, or they risk second-order consequences
Ideological measures to undermine the regime's stability carry significant risks of counter escalation
|
摘要 | This report examines a range of possible means to extend Russia. As the 2018 National Defense Strategy recognized, the United States is currently locked in a great-power competition with Russia. This report seeks to define areas where the United States can compete to its own advantage. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative data from Western and Russian sources, this report examines Russia's economic, political, and military vulnerabilities and anxieties. It then analyzes potential policy options to exploit them — ideologically, economically, geopolitically, and militarily (including air and space, maritime, land, and multidomain options). After describing each measure, this report assesses the associated benefits, costs, and risks, as well as the likelihood that measure could be successfully implemented and actually extend Russia. Most of the steps covered in this report are in some sense escalatory, and most would likely prompt some Russian counter-escalation. Some of these policies, however, also might prompt adverse reactions from other U.S. adversaries — most notably, China — that could, in turn, stress the United States. Ultimately, this report concludes that the most attractive U.S. policy options to extend Russia — with the greatest benefits, highest likelihood of success, and least risk — are in the economic domain, featuring a combination of boosting U.S. energy production and sanctions, providing the latter are multilateral. In contrast, geopolitical measures to bait Russia into overextending itself and ideological measures to undermine the regime's stability carry significant risks. Finally, many military options — including force posture changes and development of new capabilities — could enhance U.S. deterrence and reassure U.S. allies, but only a few are likely to extend Russia, as Moscow is not seeking parity with the United States in most domains. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Geopolitical Strategic Competition ; Military Command and Control ; North Atlantic Treaty Organization ; Nuclear Deterrence ; Peacekeeping and Stability Operations ; Russia ; U.S.-European Relations |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3063.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523787 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | James Dobbins,Raphael S. Cohen,Nathan Chandler,et al. Extending Russia: Competing from Advantageous Ground. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR3063.pdf(2717KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1560534631114.jpg.p(4KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。