Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2691 |
来源ID | RR-2691 |
America's Strategy-Resource Mismatch: Addressing the Gaps Between U.S. National Strategy and Military Capacity | |
Timothy M. Bonds; Michael J. Mazarr; James Dobbins; Michael J. Lostumbo; Michael Johnson; David A. Shlapak; Jeffrey Martini; Scott Boston; Cristina L. Garafola; John Gordon IV; et al. | |
发表日期 | 2019-05-07 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Significant policy-resource gaps exist
Investments will need to be prioritized by their importance to the United States and its interests
|
摘要 | Significant gaps exist in the ability of the United States and its allies to deter or defeat aggression that could threaten national interests. For example, NATO members Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania remain vulnerable to Russian invasion. South Korea is vulnerable to North Korea's artillery. China's neighbors — especially Taiwan — are vulnerable to coercion and aggression. Violent extremists continue to pose a threat in the Middle East. Solutions to these problems will take both money and time. In this report, RAND researchers analyze the specific technological, doctrinal, and budgetary gaps between the stated strategic and defense policies of the United States and the resources and capabilities that would be required to implement those policies successfully. ,Absent a change in administration policy or a new political consensus in favor of a defense buildup, there will not be enough resources to close the gap between stated U.S. aims and the military capabilities needed to achieve them. This leaves the Trump administration and this Congress with some difficult choices. The United States could decide to focus primarily on its own security, devoting to allies and partners only those forces and capabilities that could be easily spared. At the other end of the spectrum, the Trump administration could take the central role in defending U.S. allies against aggression by Russia, China, and other potential adversaries. The hard-to-find middle ground would be to provide the military with sufficient capabilities to ensure that aggression that imperils U.S. interests in critical regions would fail while helping allies build the capacity to do more for their own and the collective defense. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Global Security ; Military Budgets and Defense Spending ; Military Doctrine ; North Atlantic Treaty Organization ; Nuclear Deterrence ; United States |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2691.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523790 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Timothy M. Bonds,Michael J. Mazarr,James Dobbins,et al. America's Strategy-Resource Mismatch: Addressing the Gaps Between U.S. National Strategy and Military Capacity. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR2691.pdf(6403KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1557234853453.jpg.p(3KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。