Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1745 |
来源ID | RR-1745-A |
A Stated Preference Analysis of the Determinants of Unit and Soldier Operational Effectiveness | |
Craig A. Bond; M. Wade Markel; Olesya Tkacheva; Richard E. Darilek; Robert G. Fix; Bryan W. Hallmark; Henry A. Leonard; Duncan Long; Todd Nichols | |
发表日期 | 2019-05-13 |
出版年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | For unit capabilities, on average, Regular Army officers preferred to employ Regular Army units, all else equal
For individual officers, component mattered most for positions concerned with day-to-day monitoring and management of military operations
Key takeaway for future use of this method in a military context is the importance of inducing trade-offs for respondents through the experimental design
|
摘要 | U.S. Department of Defense Directive 1200.17 prescribes that services integrate their reserve components into the "total force based on the attributes of the particular component and individual competencies." After more than ten years of war, however, there have been no studies that assess the relative capabilities of Regular Army and reserve component units of the same type. Accordingly, the authors of this study employed a stated preference approach to assess the relative importance of component status relative to a number of other potential determinants of operational effectiveness, including but not limited to unit type, training level, experience in country, and associated costs and risk. The authors found that, on the one hand, Regular Army officers consistently said that Regular Army maneuver units were significantly more effective than their Army National Guard (ARNG) counterparts, but that the latter may be employed in low- to moderate-threat environments with acceptable levels of tactical and operational risk. On the other hand, reserve component officers believed ARNG maneuver units perform as effectively as their Regular Army counterparts with additional training and other preparations. Policymakers will need to decide the degree to which they want to rely on the professional judgment of Regular Army or reserve component officers on this point. Preferences with regard to enablers — units employed to support maneuver forces — were considerably less pronounced, as were those with respect to individuals. In the latter category, the dominant factor in determining individual capability was whether the individual in question had a relevant civilian acquired skill. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Military Education and Training ; Military Force Deployment ; Military Reserves ; Operational Readiness ; United States Army |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1745.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523797 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Craig A. Bond,M. Wade Markel,Olesya Tkacheva,et al. A Stated Preference Analysis of the Determinants of Unit and Soldier Operational Effectiveness. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR1745.pdf(686KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1557752960218.jpg.p(3KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。