G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2708
来源IDRR-2708-RC
Algorithmic Equity: A Framework for Social Applications
Osonde A. Osoba; Benjamin Boudreaux; Jessica Saunders; J. Luke Irwin; Pam A. Mueller; Samantha Cherney
发表日期2019-07-11
出版年2019
语种英语
结论

Fairness, or equity, is a complex and very domain-specific concept

  • Equity is a contested concept, and it will require domain-specific examination.
  • Prohibiting the use of sensitive attributes is less effective, given advanced algorithms and large secondary data sets.
  • The ground truth accuracy criteria may be inadequate.
  • Algorithmic transparency is important, but it is not a panacea.
  • Implementation practices matter. Implementation and institutional factors can both improve or reduce fairness, regardless of the fairness of the algorithms themselves.
  • There are useful technical and regulatory interventions that can address or reduce equity challenges in algorithmic decisionmaking.
摘要

Social institutions — such as markets, social media platforms, criminal justice systems, and employment processes — increasingly leverage algorithms for decisionmaking purposes. This report examines potential pathologies in institutional use of algorithmic decisionmaking tools. The primary focus of this report is to understand how to evaluate the equitable use of algorithms across a range of specific applications. The report outlines concepts of equity from philosophical, legal, and technical traditions to draw insights that apply across algorithmic decisionmaking contexts. The researchers develop a framework for examining algorithmic decisionmaking and work through three domain explorations (auto insurance, job recruitment, and criminal justice). In addition, the work contains a deep dive into an algorithm audit of a part of the North Carolina criminal justice system. The work ends with overall insights and recommendations of practical mechanisms for algorithmic governance. The subject of the report is important because unaddressed equity challenges can undermine the stability and legitimacy of social institutions and lead to severe adverse impacts on affected people.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Concepts of Equity

  • Chapter Three

    Domain Exploration: Algorithms in Auto Insurance

  • Chapter Four

    Domain Exploration: Algorithms in Employee Recruitment

  • Chapter Five

    Domain Exploration: Algorithms in U.S. Criminal Justice Systems

  • Chapter Six

    Analytic Case Study: Auditing Algorithm Use in North Carolina's Criminal Justice System

  • Chapter Seven

    Insights and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Supplemental Tables

主题Artificial Intelligence ; Automobile Insurance ; Civil Rights ; Criminal Justice ; Decisionmaking ; Racial Equity ; Workplace Discrimination
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2708.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523841
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Osonde A. Osoba,Benjamin Boudreaux,Jessica Saunders,et al. Algorithmic Equity: A Framework for Social Applications. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2708.pdf(1148KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1615385422283.jpg(6KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Osonde A. Osoba]的文章
[Benjamin Boudreaux]的文章
[Jessica Saunders]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Osonde A. Osoba]的文章
[Benjamin Boudreaux]的文章
[Jessica Saunders]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Osonde A. Osoba]的文章
[Benjamin Boudreaux]的文章
[Jessica Saunders]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2708.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1615385422283.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。