Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RR3006 |
来源ID | RR-3006-FUSA |
Options for Reinvesting Savings from Restored Federal Cost-Sharing Reduction Payments: Examining the Effects of Two Policy Alternatives on Spending and Enrollment in the Individual Health Insurance Market | |
Sarah A. Nowak; Jodi L. Liu; Preethi Rao | |
发表日期 | 2019-09-10 |
出版年 | 2019 |
页码 | 50 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | Insurance enrollment nationally would increase, but coverage in California would decrease
Out-of-pocket premium spending is different depending on the scenario
|
摘要 | Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurers are required to offer subsidies that reduce cost-sharing for eligible exchange enrollees who have incomes below 250 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) and are enrolled in silver-tiered exchange plans. Under the original implementation of the ACA, the federal government made payments to insurers to cover the costs of the cost-sharing reduction (CSR) subsidies. CSRs reduce consumers' out-of-pocket health care costs (premiums, deductibles, and coinsurance), thereby increasing the actuarial value of plans. ,In late 2017, the Trump administration decided that federal payments of CSRs were unlawful and halted the federal payments. A new congressional appropriation would be needed to reinstate federal CSR funding under the current administration's policy. Insurers are still required to provide CSR subsidies to qualifying enrollees, despite the fact that the federal government is no longer making CSR payments to insurers. As a result, most states and insurers adopted a practice known as "silver loading" to fund CSRs. ,Earlier research established that the federal government would likely save money if federal CSR payments to insurers were restored, but total health insurance enrollment — and, in particular, enrollment on the individual market — would decrease. The authors of this report analyze what would happen if federal lawmakers used the savings from restoring CSR payments to provide additional health insurance subsidies or to finance reinsurance. Additionally, they examine how these scenarios would affect premiums and out-of-pocket premium spending both in California and at the national level. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Affordable Care Act ; Health Care Costs ; Health Care Payment Approaches ; Health Insurance Cost Sharing |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3006.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523891 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sarah A. Nowak,Jodi L. Liu,Preethi Rao. Options for Reinvesting Savings from Restored Federal Cost-Sharing Reduction Payments: Examining the Effects of Two Policy Alternatives on Spending and Enrollment in the Individual Health Insurance Market. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RR3006.pdf(346KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1568037926820.jpg.p(2KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。