G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2696
来源IDRR-2696-A
Improving Army Installation Facility and Land Use Deals and Partnerships
Beth E. Lachman; Jaime L. Hastings; Mary Kate Adgie; Bradley M. Knopp; Steven Deane-Shinbrot
发表日期2019-09-16
出版年2019
语种英语
结论
  • The research identified three main categories of approach: outgrants (mostly large-scale leases, such as enhanced use leases [EULs], and easements), facility and infrastructure sharing partnerships, and other facility and land use partnerships and deals.
  • Outgrants and facility and infrastructure sharing partnerships are the most common land and facility deals and partnership approaches that can and have earned funds or saved money at military installations. They also have enhanced installation operations and readiness, improved support for military personnel and their families, and provided energy, environmental, and other benefits.
  • Other installation and community benefits from outgrants include providing uses for underutilized installation property, improving public and community relations, and providing additional jobs and other economic benefits to the local community.
  • Besides saving construction, operations and maintenance (O&M) and other facility costs and improving military operations, facility and infrastructure sharing partnerships can save manpower hours and enable innovation in space design, such as amenities and aesthetics, future space flexibility, and workspaces to promote collaboration. Major facility investment decision points can provide opportunities to develop and implement such approaches.
  • Main drivers for facility and infrastructure sharing partnerships are a desire to reduce costs, wanting to improve the military mission, and/or the need to decide about a major facility investment, such as the need to upgrade or construct a new building.
  • State and local governments play important roles to facilitate, support, and participate in such installation partnerships and deals.
  • Developing and implementing these outgrants and facility and infrastructure sharing partnerships can be challenging. Project complexity, legal requirements, and government policies limit and slow development of these deals. Other challenges include lack of staff experience with them, limited incentives for implementation, the time required for implementation, security and access concerns, and cultural differences between the military and the potential partners.
摘要

Army installation facility and land use deals and partnerships can provide Army installations with substantial benefits, such as saving costs and improving installation operations. The partnerships that often produce the greatest financial benefits involve installation real estate, buildings, and other facilities (such as air fields). These arrangements have generated significant revenue and saved substantial funds for some military installations. Army installations have been facing significant budget reductions and need to find ways to maintain operations and even enhance installation readiness despite declining budgets. An installation real estate deal or facility sharing partnership might be one way for the Army to save and earn large amounts of money. However, the U.S. Army has taken only limited advantage of these approaches, partly because of several barriers. Implementing these arrangements can be time-consuming, complex, and manpower-intensive, and they require significant local knowledge and ongoing community and partner communications. In addition, their development and implementation usually require financial, legal, contracting, real estate, engineering, and other technical expertise and resources, and these are not always readily available on the installation. This report assesses Army installation real estate and facility deals and partnership approaches, such as large-scale leasing deals (sometimes called enhanced use leases [EULs]), and provides recommendations to improve installation use of these approaches to save costs, improve installation operations and readiness, and increase other benefits.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Identifying Approaches and Practices for Developing and Implementing Installation Facility Sharing and Real Estate Deals and Partnerships

  • Chapter Three

    Military Installation Outgrants

  • Chapter Four

    Facility and Infrastructure Sharing Partnerships with Other Government Agencies

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Case Study Examples of Installation Outgrants

  • Appendix B

    Legal Authorities and the Outgrant Process

  • Appendix C

    Other National Security Facility and Infrastructure Sharing Partnership Examples

主题Civil-Military Relations ; Energy Distribution ; Energy Resources ; Military Budgets and Defense Spending ; Military Facilities ; Military Families ; United States Air Force ; United States Army ; United States Department of Defense
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2696.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523895
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Beth E. Lachman,Jaime L. Hastings,Mary Kate Adgie,et al. Improving Army Installation Facility and Land Use Deals and Partnerships. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2696.pdf(3190KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1568639230529.jpg.p(6KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Beth E. Lachman]的文章
[Jaime L. Hastings]的文章
[Mary Kate Adgie]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Beth E. Lachman]的文章
[Jaime L. Hastings]的文章
[Mary Kate Adgie]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Beth E. Lachman]的文章
[Jaime L. Hastings]的文章
[Mary Kate Adgie]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2696.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1568639230529.jpg.pagespeed.ic.WOLl7bDSY8.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。