G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2931
来源IDRR-2931-AF
Air Force Capability Development Planning: Analytical Methods to Support Investment Decisions
James A. Leftwich; Debra Knopman; Jordan R. Fischbach; Michael J. D. Vermeer; Kristin Van Abel; Nidhi Kalra
发表日期2019-12-11
出版年2019
语种英语
结论
  • Compared with existing methods currently in use for CDP, DMDU methods — and specifically the RDM paradigm — could support investment decisionmaking in situations when evidence is lacking to quantify the probability of future threats and risks and in the face of deep uncertainties.
  • A workshop in which RAND experts and Air Force stakeholders explored ways to frame a decision problem revealed the layers of complexity embedded within the CDP challenge to produce decision-quality analysis to support design and planning choices.
  • Workshop participants identified technical limitations to implementing RDM, including availability of models and their fidelity.
  • Participants also noted that the practicalities of developing competencies in a new approach for which the capabilities may need to be built rather than simply adapted will be a challenge. A related issue is the adequacy of internal staffing and capacity to support CDP.
  • RDM and similar methods represent a fundamental shift in problem-solving from prediction-then-act analysis and decisionmaking to a risk management approach of seeking robust solutions across a range of future threat environments and other uncertainties. The key output of this type of approach is not a single answer but rather trade-off curves or other visualizations that compare performance of alternative strategies or portfolios of options with the status quo or other baseline in terms of metrics that reflect what is most important to the Air Force.
摘要

In view of uncertainties about the future threat environment, trajectories of technological development, and shifting budgeting priorities, RAND Project AIR FORCE examined analytical methods that would best guide the recently established Air Force Warfighting Integration Capability in capability development planning (CDP), as well as concept development and future force design. In their review, researchers found that specific methods of decisionmaking under deep uncertainty (DMDU) can provide the most suitable means for arriving at solutions that are flexible, adaptable, and robust and guiding investment pathways and modernization efforts.

,

The method highlighted, Robust Decisionmaking, rests on a simple concept. Rather than using models and data to assess policies under a single set of assumptions, RDM runs models over hundreds to thousands of different sets of assumptions about the problem space with the aim of understanding how plans perform under many plausible conditions. Each of the four steps of RDM — decision-framing, case generation, vulnerability assessment and scenario discovery, and trade-off analysis — feeds into the next, providing stakeholders and decisionmakers with a more informed tradespace. By exposing vulnerabilities of different options under different scenarios, RDM can enable stakeholders to engage in a rich dialogue about which risks or vulnerabilities are acceptable, as well as to review assumptions made in framing the problem and make adjustments as needed.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Capability Development Planning in the Air Force

  • Chapter Three

    Current Assessment and Aspirational View of Capability Development Planning

  • Chapter Four

    Analytic Methods for Capability Development Planning

  • Chapter Five

    Decision-Framing Exercise

  • Chapter Six

    Recommendations and Next Steps

  • Appendix

    Background Information on Capability Development Planning and Strategy, Planning, and Programming Process

主题Military Transformation ; Robust Decision Making ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2931.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/523967
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
James A. Leftwich,Debra Knopman,Jordan R. Fischbach,et al. Air Force Capability Development Planning: Analytical Methods to Support Investment Decisions. 2019.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2931.pdf(3584KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1576070565283.jpg.p(2KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[James A. Leftwich]的文章
[Debra Knopman]的文章
[Jordan R. Fischbach]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[James A. Leftwich]的文章
[Debra Knopman]的文章
[Jordan R. Fischbach]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[James A. Leftwich]的文章
[Debra Knopman]的文章
[Jordan R. Fischbach]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2931.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1576070565283.jpg.pagespeed.ic.-M2DwNTUK8.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。