G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR2575.4-1
来源IDRR-2575/4-1-BMGF
School Improvement Plans: Is There Room for Improvement?
Christopher Joseph Doss; Goke Akinniranye; Katie Tosh
发表日期2020-04-08
出版年2020
页码4
语种英语
结论

SIPs are well-known as a concept, but teachers and principals diverge in their views on their ability to improve the school

  • SIPs are common, and the majority of teachers (75 percent) and principals (99 percent) are familiar with their major points.
  • Principals are more likely than teachers to believe that SIPs change teaching practices (67 percent versus 44 percent) and that SIPs improve schools in a five-year period (81 percent versus 62 percent).
  • If teachers are familiar with the major points of their SIPs, they are over 40 percentage points more likely to say that the SIP has changed teaching practices and that the SIP will improve their schools.
摘要

School Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been a central feature of American school reform for over two decades. These organizing documents detail educators' goals for improving educational practice and student outcomes and initiatives for achieving those goals. For SIPs to lead to school improvement, educators must be aware of the details of their school's SIP and accept its stated goals and reform efforts. However, organizational focus and cohesion in working toward common, schoolwide goals do not necessarily exist within schools. In fact, research in some states and districts has found that educators' perspectives on the effectiveness of SIPs can vary by their position in the school. Researchers used the RAND Corporation's web-based American Educator Panels to ask a nationally representative sample of educators about their awareness of their school's SIP and their attitudes toward the effectiveness of SIPs in changing instruction and school quality. Researchers then examined how those responses vary by position (teacher or principal). A majority of educators are aware of their school's SIPs, but principals express more optimism in its ability to improve the school. Knowledge of the SIP is also positively correlated with a teacher's view that the SIP can promote school improvement. Though only a minority of teachers are unfamiliar with SIPs, our results suggest that this unfamiliarity may be one impediment to SIP effectiveness.

目录 School Improvement Plans: Is There Room for Improvement? | RAND
主题Education Reform ; Educational Institutions ; Principals ; Teachers and Teaching
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2575z4-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524052
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Christopher Joseph Doss,Goke Akinniranye,Katie Tosh. School Improvement Plans: Is There Room for Improvement?. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR2575z4-1.pdf(108KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1586350788475.jpg(10KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Joseph Doss]的文章
[Goke Akinniranye]的文章
[Katie Tosh]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Joseph Doss]的文章
[Goke Akinniranye]的文章
[Katie Tosh]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Christopher Joseph Doss]的文章
[Goke Akinniranye]的文章
[Katie Tosh]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR2575z4-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1586350788475.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。