G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR4200
来源IDRR-4200-AF
Building Agile Combat Support Competencies to Enable Evolving Adaptive Basing Concepts
Patrick Mills; James A. Leftwich; John G. Drew; Daniel P. Felten; Josh Girardini; John P. Godges; Michael J. Lostumbo; Anu Narayanan; Kristin Van Abel; Jonathan W. Welburn; et al.
发表日期2020-04-16
出版年2020
语种英语
结论

The ACS community should make changes to force packages, competencies, and training and deployment practices to implement AB concepts

  • The design of current force packages is ill-suited for executing AB concepts. Most force packages are not designed for incrementally scaling capabilities up or down.
  • Implementing AB concepts would require the Air Force to develop new competencies, including those for operating integrated-basing networks, providing flightline maintenance at the integrated bases to support flexible operations, and scaling base capabilities rapidly.
  • Although changes to ACS organization, training, and deployment practices could enable the ACS community to implement AB concepts more efficiently, much work remains to be done to assess the investment, risk, and performance implications.

The Air Force will have to implement wide-ranging changes to implement AB concepts

  • AB represents a fundamental pivot in how the Air Force presents forces to warfighting commands. These changes in how the Air Force prepares and delivers forces to the warfighting commands would take time to implement.
  • Concurrence among planners and logisticians on the beneficial outcomes that AB concepts could offer combatant commanders would help all parties recognize which concepts should be pursued under which circumstances and, thus, which ACS activities would be most helpful.
  • The dynamics of AB would require a renewed focus on mastering the operational art of war, which would encompass contingency planning and execution, tactical command and control (C2) for ACS, and the tailoring of AB force deployment and employment concepts for each new contingency. These skills have atrophied over the years as a result of regular, rotational force deployments.
摘要

In many potential operating environments, the U.S. Air Force faces adversaries that are increasingly capable of limiting where and how it projects combat power. Whether the environments are called anti-access/area denial environments or contested, degraded, and operationally limited (CDO) environments, they feature adversaries with larger numbers of more-precise missiles that have further reach than before and that threaten traditional U.S. air bases like never before. To persevere in CDO environments, the Air Force and regional warfighting commanders are exploring a variety of alternative force deployment and employment concepts under an umbrella initiative called adaptive basing (AB). Upon surveying the variety of concepts categorized as part of AB, the authors found that all of them—adaptive or not—can be characterized as survival strategies. Thus, AB is less about increasing the adaptiveness of aircraft and air forces than it is about extending their survivability through strategies that are both traditional and adaptive.

,

In this report, RAND researchers review the motivations for AB, describe a footprint model used for estimating the AB implications for Agile Combat Support (ACS), estimate the ACS requirements to perform three fundamental competencies that can enable AB concepts, consider the obstacles to supporting those requirements, and discuss the implications and recommendations for the ACS community and the Air Force at large.

,

Ultimately, it will take a more-concerted, deliberate, and organized effort to flesh out and refine AB concepts into useable warfighting tools. Some concepts might be discarded for reasons of feasibility, cost, or effectiveness, but if the threats perceived today are credible, AB ought to be tested and found wanting rather than declared to be too difficult without sufficient investigation.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction: The Challenges of Adaptive Basing

  • Chapter Two

    Adaptive Basing and Its Enabling Agile Combat Support Competencies

  • Chapter Three

    Estimating the Resource Requirements for Agile Combat Support Competencies

  • Chapter Four

    Resource Requirements for Integrated Basing

  • Chapter Five

    Resource Requirements for Flexible Operations

  • Chapter Six

    Resource Requirements for Rapid Scalability

  • Chapter Seven

    Implications and Recommendations

主题Combat Service Support ; Military Force Planning ; Operational Readiness ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4200.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524066
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Patrick Mills,James A. Leftwich,John G. Drew,et al. Building Agile Combat Support Competencies to Enable Evolving Adaptive Basing Concepts. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR4200.pdf(1404KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1587042050590.jpg(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Patrick Mills]的文章
[James A. Leftwich]的文章
[John G. Drew]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Patrick Mills]的文章
[James A. Leftwich]的文章
[John G. Drew]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Patrick Mills]的文章
[James A. Leftwich]的文章
[John G. Drew]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR4200.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
文件名: 1587042050590.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。