G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA199-1
来源IDRR-A199-1
Limb Salvage and Recovery After Severe Blast Injury: Literature Review for the Eighth Department of Defense International State-of-the-Science Meeting on Blast Injury Research
Charles C. Engel; Molly M. Simmons; Sara E. Heins; Mimi Shen; Gulrez Shah Azhar; Tepring Piquado
发表日期2020-07-06
出版年2020
语种英语
结论

There is a very limited body of empirical research on blast-related injuries to extremities and subsequent limb salvage—much more research is needed

  • An important gap is the absence of completed prospective, longitudinal studies with follow-up longer than one year.
  • There is limited evidence on the outcomes of amputation versus limb salvage overall and in clinically relevant subgroups.
  • Current evidence comparing various surgical approaches to limb salvage for blast-related limb injury is limited.
  • The most underdeveloped area of empirical research pertains to rehabilitative approaches in caring for blast-injured patients with severe limb injuries. Promising programs have been identified, but codification and empirical evaluation are needed.

Severe limb injuries are common among combat-injured service members

  • Persistent and disabling pain, sleep disturbance, depression and anxiety, and general loss of functioning are common after these injuries.
  • Most service members with severe combat-related limb injury are significantly disabled.

There is no one-size-fits-all intervention for severe blast-related limb injuries

  • To date, prognostic assessment tools have largely failed as decision aids for clinicians and patients.
  • There is a need for ongoing, intensive efforts to share and study decisionmaking with patients, caregivers as appropriate, and a multidisciplinary clinical team.
摘要

During the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, there have been changes in the mechanism, severity, and complexity of injuries from improvised explosive devices⁠—changes that have resulted in a higher incidence of combat-related traumatic injuries. Battlefield medical advances and improvements in protective equipment have resulted in a greater proportion of blast-exposed service members surviving their severe injuries, and progress in surgical reconstruction and rehabilitation has resulted in an increased medical capacity to salvage limbs. Collectively, these developments have led to important questions about when to emphasize limb salvage over other treatment options, most notably amputation, for individuals with severe blast-related limb injuries.

,

To better understand limb salvage and recovery after severe blast-related injury, the authors conducted a literature review of recent research on the topic. They considered completed research addressing one or more of four objectives: (1) injury epidemiology and outcomes; (2) the clinical decision to salvage the limb; (3) the process of limb restoration and reconstruction; and (4) rehabilitation, reintegration, and recovery strategies. They found that although there is a vast literature on limb salvage, there is limited research on military blast-related limb salvage. The authors make several recommendations related to future research into limb salvage and recovery after severe blast injury.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Background and Purpose

  • Chapter Two

    Review Methodology

  • Chapter Three

    Results

  • Chapter Four

    Discussion and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Planning Committee Members

主题Combat Medicine ; Epidemiology ; Evidence Based Health Practice ; Health Care Technology ; Trauma ; Veterans Health Care
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA199-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524147
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Charles C. Engel,Molly M. Simmons,Sara E. Heins,et al. Limb Salvage and Recovery After Severe Blast Injury: Literature Review for the Eighth Department of Defense International State-of-the-Science Meeting on Blast Injury Research. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA199-1.pdf(943KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1599771355794.jpg.p(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Charles C. Engel]的文章
[Molly M. Simmons]的文章
[Sara E. Heins]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Charles C. Engel]的文章
[Molly M. Simmons]的文章
[Sara E. Heins]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Charles C. Engel]的文章
[Molly M. Simmons]的文章
[Sara E. Heins]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA199-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1599771355794.jpg.pagespeed.ic.DnZvdS--In.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。