G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA200-1
来源IDRR-A200-1
Maintaining the Competitive Advantage in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
Rand Waltzman; Lillian Ablon; Christian Curriden; Gavin S. Hartnett; Maynard A. Holliday; Logan Ma; Brian Nichiporuk; Andrew Scobell; Danielle C. Tarraf
发表日期2020-07-08
出版年2020
语种英语
结论
  • It is difficult, perhaps impossible, to arrive at a definitive statement about which country has the lead in AI. It is more useful to talk about various parts of the AI ecosystem. It appears possible that the United States has a narrow lead in several key areas of AI, although China has several advantages and a high degree of leadership focus on this issue.
  • As of early 2020, the United States has a modest lead in AI technology development because of its substantial advantage in the advanced semiconductor sector. China is attempting to erode this edge through massive government investment. The lack of a substantial U.S. industrial policy also works to Chinese advantage.
  • China has an advantage over the United States in the area of big data sets that are essential to the development of AI applications. This is partly because data collection by the Chinese government and large Chinese tech companies is not constrained by privacy laws and protections. However, the Chinese advantage in data volume is probably insufficient to overcome the U.S. edge in semiconductors.
  • Breakthrough fundamental research is not a critical dimension for comparing U.S.-China relative competitive standing from a DoD perspective. Fundamental research, regardless of whether it is U.S., Chinese, or a U.S.-Chinese collaboration, is available to all.
  • Commercial industry is also not a critical dimension for competitive comparison. Industries with corporate headquarters in the United States and in China seek to provide products and services wherever the market is.
摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies hold the potential to become critical force multipliers in future armed conflicts. The People's Republic of China has identified AI as key to its goal of enhancing its national competitiveness and protecting its national security. If its current AI plan is successful, China will achieve a substantial military advantage over the United States and its allies. That has significant negative strategic implications for the United States. How much of a lead does the United States have, and what do the United States and the U.S. Air Force (USAF) need to do to maintain that lead? To address this question, the authors conducted a comparative analysis of U.S. and Chinese AI strategies, cultural and structural factors, and military capability development, examining the relevant literature in both English and Chinese. They looked at literature on trends and breakthroughs, business concerns, comparative cultural analysis, and military science and operational concepts. The authors found that the critical dimensions for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) involve development and engineering for transitioning AI to the military; advances in validation, verification, testing, and evaluation; and operational concepts for AI. Significantly, each of these dimensions is under direct DoD control.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Comparing U.S.-China Artificial Intelligence Ecosystems

  • Chapter Three

    Recommendations

  • Chapter Four

    Conclusions and Future Research

主题China ; Machine Learning ; United States Department of Defense
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA200-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524152
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Rand Waltzman,Lillian Ablon,Christian Curriden,et al. Maintaining the Competitive Advantage in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA200-1.pdf(682KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1594212305225.jpg.p(2KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Rand Waltzman]的文章
[Lillian Ablon]的文章
[Christian Curriden]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Rand Waltzman]的文章
[Lillian Ablon]的文章
[Christian Curriden]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Rand Waltzman]的文章
[Lillian Ablon]的文章
[Christian Curriden]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA200-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1594212305225.jpg.pagespeed.ic.mIl5RXPSCa.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。