G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR3254
来源IDRR-3254-OSD
An Updated Look at Military and Civilian Pay Levels and Recruit Quality
Troy D. Smith; Beth J. Asch; Michael G. Mattock
发表日期2020-07-30
出版年2020
语种英语
结论

RMC continues to support readiness and lies above the benchmark of the 70th percentile set by the Ninth QRMC

  • RMC for active-component enlisted personnel in 2017 was at the 85th percentile of comparably educated civilian wages.
  • RMC for active-component officers in 2017 was at the 77th percentile.
  • These percentiles were similar to what they were in 2009.

As the RMC/wage ratio increased, recruit quality increased in the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, but not in the Army

  • The Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force increased the quality of their recruits as the RMC/wage ratio increased.
  • Army recruiting may have become more difficult during the 2000s because of extensive deployments in support of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the Army may have set its recruiting quality goals to hold recruit quality constant as RMC increased.

There appear to be large differences in how RMC compares with comparably educated civilian pay across geographies for individuals of different education levels

  • Enlisted military with a high school degree are likely to find military pay relative to civilian pay as attractive in urban as in nonurban areas — a change from earlier years when military pay was relatively less attractive in urban areas.
  • Officers and those with more education in general are likely to find military pay higher relative to civilian pay if they live in less urban areas than if they live in more urban areas.
摘要

Given an all-volunteer force, compensation and benefits are critical for attracting and retaining the quantity and quality of military personnel necessary for the United States to achieve its military goals. The military must set pay high enough to draw quality recruits away from other jobs that they could obtain, while also appropriately managing public funds. Analyzing data from 1999, the Ninth Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation (QRMC) recommended in 2002 that regular military compensation (RMC) — which is the sum of basic pay, basic allowance for housing, basic allowance for subsistence, and the federal tax advantage resulting from allowances not being taxed — be at around the 70th percentile of comparably educated civilian wages. The authors' analysis indicates that RMC has consistently remained above that benchmark and has thus continued to support readiness. The authors also found that as the RMC/wage ratio increased over time, recruit quality increased in the Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, but not in the Army. In addition, they saw large differences in how RMC compares with civilian pay across geographies for individuals of different education levels: Whereas officers and those with more education in general are likely to find military pay higher relative to civilian pay if they live in less-urban areas, enlisted military with a high school degree are likely to find military pay as attractive in urban as in nonurban areas. On average, RMC in 2017 was at the 85th percentile for active-component enlisted personnel and at the 77th percentile for active-component officers.

目录 An Updated Look at Military and Civilian Pay Levels and Recruit Quality | RAND
主题Enlisted Personnel ; Military Compensation ; Military Officers ; Military Recruitment ; Wages and Compensation
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3254.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524171
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Troy D. Smith,Beth J. Asch,Michael G. Mattock. An Updated Look at Military and Civilian Pay Levels and Recruit Quality. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR3254.pdf(825KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1596109422792.jpg(7KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Troy D. Smith]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Troy D. Smith]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Troy D. Smith]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR3254.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1596109422792.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。