G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR4193
来源IDRR-4193-AF
Strategies for Acquisition Agility: Approaches for Speeding Delivery of Defense Capabilities
Philip S. Anton; Brynn Tannehill; Jake McKeon; Benjamin Goirigolzarri; Maynard A. Holliday; Mark A. Lorell; Obaid Younossi
发表日期2020-08-27
出版年2020
语种英语
结论

There are several approaches to speeding acquisition, and each approach can be applied in different domains and via several different strategies

  • A common approach to speeding acquisition is to prioritize schedule over cost or technical performance. But there are more-nuanced and varied approaches that can be taken.
  • Agility depends not just on acquisition strategies and processes but also on an empowered workforce and on flexibility and trade-offs in requirements, budgeting, technology, and intelligence activities.
  • Developing new capabilities takes time, so many approaches use mature or commercially available technology to speed initial delivery.

In categorizing the necessary conditions for each acceleration approach, added practical perspectives were found

  • Few approaches are universally applicable. The right one for a given acquisition depends on the conditions for application, domains involved (e.g., requirements, budgeting, acquisition), resources available, and implementation issues.
  • Other financial considerations can speed acquisition beyond simply paying more in costs to get capabilities faster.
  • Perhaps the most hidden (and sometimes forgotten) enabler of rapid acquisition is a highly skilled workforce.

Each approach has practical considerations for implementation

  • Going faster can introduce risks, such as system or acquisition failure, cost and schedule growth, and unintended or unknown side effects (e.g., increased higher sustainment costs or less interoperable systems). Careful consideration should be taken of the possible and even unknown implications of going faster.
  • Approach selection and implementation can be informed by key considerations related to acquisition strategies, acquisition processes, program structures, headquarters structures, requirements, budgeting, and downsides and trade-offs.
摘要

Long acquisition times have been a significant concern for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) for decades. It is critical to provide capabilities to warfighters in a timely manner relative to the threats faced, and various approaches have been taken to reduce acquisition timelines. To reduce the time required to field operational capabilities, various Department of the Air Force and other DoD organizations have used a wide variety of approaches to acquisition that are more responsive and more agile. These organizational strategies for accelerated acquisition draw on multiple approaches and techniques, including some that can reduce acquisition time compared with norms and others that might mitigate (minimize) schedule growth. In this report, the research team identifies and analyzes various approaches, assesses their suitability for different conditions and types of acquisition, and identifies implementation issues. The team also develops a selection framework and tool that help program managers and leadership identify relevant approaches.

目录 Strategies for Acquisition Agility: Approaches for Speeding Delivery of Defense Capabilities | RAND
主题Military Acquisition and Procurement ; Military Transformation ; Rapid Force Deployment ; United States Department of Defense
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4193.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524192
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Philip S. Anton,Brynn Tannehill,Jake McKeon,et al. Strategies for Acquisition Agility: Approaches for Speeding Delivery of Defense Capabilities. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR4193.pdf(1397KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1598988970761.jpg.p(1KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Philip S. Anton]的文章
[Brynn Tannehill]的文章
[Jake McKeon]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Philip S. Anton]的文章
[Brynn Tannehill]的文章
[Jake McKeon]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Philip S. Anton]的文章
[Brynn Tannehill]的文章
[Jake McKeon]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR4193.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1598988970761.jpg.pagespeed.ic.s7JFUNvLGe.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。