G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA249-1
来源IDRR-A249-1
Data Use in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems: Lessons Learned from Quality Start Los Angeles
Jill S. Cannon; Celia J. Gomez; Anamarie A. Whitaker
发表日期2020-09-09
出版年2020
页码12
语种英语
结论
  • Variable definitions and entry protocols sometimes differed across organizations, limiting the ability to use existing data to fully address several intended research questions.
  • When data are not easy to manipulate or export for staff or evaluator use, analyses are less likely to happen in a timely manner.
  • Most QRIS models evolve and change as new providers are added, new funds become available for service expansion, or program evaluation leads to improvements in the design. But decisionmakers are often interested in comparing implementation measures or program outcomes over time, which can present a challenge if some time periods had different data-entry requirements.
  • The existence of multiple data sources—from multiple partners and changes over time—can make ongoing evaluation more time-intensive and, in some cases, depending on data quality across the sources and linking variables, questions might not be answerable. Creating processes to link distinct data sources collected by different organizations enhances the potential for data use.
  • To know whether quality improvement models are improving provider quality, data systems must be able to link model components—such as coaching or technical assistance—to such outcomes as tier ratings or classroom assessment scores. This linkage requires advance preparation to identify the key goals for data use and research questions of interest and to ensure that the data system is built to address them.
摘要

Quality Start Los Angeles (QSLA) is a county-level quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) that supports center-based and family child care providers serving children from birth to age five. During a developmental evaluation of QSLA that focused on program coaching, assessment technical assistance, and quality tier rating perceptions, the authors of this report also examined data use at QSLA. In this report, they identified strengths, challenges, and lessons learned that could benefit other QRISs or early learning systems as such organizations create or expand data systems, noting that, even with good intentions and a strong data system infrastructure, data use might not always be implemented as expected.

目录 Data Use in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems: Lessons Learned from Quality Start Los Angeles | RAND
主题Educational Program Evaluation ; Los Angeles ; Quality Rating and Improvement System (Early Childhood Education)
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA249-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524204
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Jill S. Cannon,Celia J. Gomez,Anamarie A. Whitaker. Data Use in Quality Rating and Improvement Systems: Lessons Learned from Quality Start Los Angeles. 2020.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA249-1.pdf(2411KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1612187076933.jpg.p(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Jill S. Cannon]的文章
[Celia J. Gomez]的文章
[Anamarie A. Whitaker]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Jill S. Cannon]的文章
[Celia J. Gomez]的文章
[Anamarie A. Whitaker]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Jill S. Cannon]的文章
[Celia J. Gomez]的文章
[Anamarie A. Whitaker]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA249-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1612187076933.jpg.pagespeed.ic.yWLksgmQ5c.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。