G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR4267
来源IDRR-4267-OSD
Compensation and Benefits for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Workers: A Comparison of the Federal Government and the Private Sector
Kathryn A. Edwards; Maria McCollester; Brian Phillips; Hannah Acheson-Field; Isabel Leamon; Noah Johnson; Maria C. Lytell
发表日期2021-01-19
出版年2021
页码249
语种英语
结论

There are notable differences between federal and private-sector STEM workers

  • There are more advanced degree holders among federal STEM workers than private-sector workers, but the federal STEM workforce skews older in age.
  • Overall, there is relatively more gender and racial/ethnic diversity in the federal STEM workforce, although the private sector has a larger share of Asian and foreign-born workers.
  • Women and minorities face pay disparities in both sectors, but somewhat less so in federal employment.

Comparing average income for private-sector and federal STEM workers indicates private-sector STEM workers earn more after controlling for observable differences

  • Private-sector STEM workers earn about $2,600 more in annual pay than federal STEM workers once observable differences are taken into account.
  • However, STEM workers in the federal government work shorter hours on average and are more likely to have access to benefits than STEM workers in the private sector.

Potential impediments to federal STEM hiring and retention merit further exploration

  • If federal job postings are not readily accessible and comprehensible, this may prevent prospective workers from applying.
  • If the hiring process is too lengthy or onerous, workers may turn to the private sector.
  • Federal shutdowns, pay freezes, and frequent leadership changes or lengthy vacancies may negatively affect hiring and retention.

Current data collection processes have limitations

  • Data limitations influenced how RAND's study was conducted, and, in some areas, impeded researchers' ability to draw definitive conclusions.
  • Notably, data sets with the best coverage for each sector differ in how they conceptualize, collect, and report income.
摘要

In a companion report to the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services directed the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Office of Personnel Management and the Department of Energy, to conduct a comparison of salary and benefits for government professional engineers and scientists with those for workers in similar positions in the private sector. Asked to undertake this analysis, RAND researchers interpreted "engineers and scientists" as the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforces in the public (federal civilian) and private sectors.

,

The authors compiled and analyzed workforce data from U.S. government sources and available literature to describe and compare trends in private- and public-sector STEM employment levels, unemployment rates, work hours, salary, and benefits. Where data were available, they also conducted subgroup analyses of these trends based on demographics, education levels, occupational categories, and geographic regions. In this report, the authors examine why STEM workers are of special interest to national defense and the civilian economy. They describe and compare the characteristics, employment trends, and pay levels of the private- and public-sector STEM workforces to their non-STEM counterparts. The report concludes with a discussion of how compensation is but one component of hiring and retaining qualified workers in the federal government and presents a set of policy and research recommendations.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics in the Workforce

  • Chapter Two

    The Private-Sector STEM Workforce

  • Chapter Three

    The Federal Public-Sector STEM Workforce

  • Chapter Four

    Comparing Federal and Private-Sector STEM Compensation

  • Chapter Five

    The Department of Defense STEM Workforce

  • Chapter Six

    Discussion

  • Appendix A

    STEM Occupations and Crosswalks

  • Appendix B

    Federal Policy Background

  • Appendix C

    Detailed Pay, Income, and Comparisons for Federal and Private-Sector STEM Workers

主题Labor Markets ; Scientific Professions ; STEM Education ; Technical Professions ; United States Department of Defense ; Wages and Compensation ; Workforce Diversity
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR4267.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524338
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kathryn A. Edwards,Maria McCollester,Brian Phillips,et al. Compensation and Benefits for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Workers: A Comparison of the Federal Government and the Private Sector. 2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RR4267.pdf(2968KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1611060974299.jpg.p(1KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kathryn A. Edwards]的文章
[Maria McCollester]的文章
[Brian Phillips]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kathryn A. Edwards]的文章
[Maria McCollester]的文章
[Brian Phillips]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kathryn A. Edwards]的文章
[Maria McCollester]的文章
[Brian Phillips]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RR4267.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1611060974299.jpg.pagespeed.ic.JWZdS5rQU0.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。