G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA793-1
来源IDRR-A793-1
Winning the Battle of the Airfields: Seventy Years of RAND Analysis on Air Base Defense and Attack
Alan J. Vick; Mark Ashby
发表日期2021-02-24
出版年2021
语种英语
结论

RAND has made far-reaching contributions to the resiliency of U.S. air power, and sometimes led the way

  • Over seven decades, RAND analysis has responded to an ever-evolving geopolitical, military, and technological landscape in step with its DoD and USAF sponsors, but, given RAND's charter, it was not entirely bound by them.
  • At critical junctures, RAND led its DoD and USAF sponsors, identifying emerging threats to air bases and potential solutions well before the broader community acknowledged them.
  • RAND's greatest contributions were in its disciplined and creative application of more formal analytical tools to the problem of ABD/A. RAND researchers invented and applied these tools so that the relative utility of various offensive and defensive concepts could be measured systematically.

RAND analysis of ABD/A offers several enduring insights

  • Air bases have always been, and are likely to remain, priority targets in wars. This is true because air power is an element that must be countered to prevail in conflict, and air bases are specific points of vulnerability.
  • Air base attackers will rarely limit themselves to a single attack mode.
  • There are no simple or cheap means to defend air bases.
  • Aircraft dispersal on and across bases has renewed salience for air base defense. Distributed operations present a host of challenges but are often easier to implement than other passive defense options and do not require massive investments in infrastructure at bases that may not be needed in the next war.
  • ABD/A is best understood from a systems perspective.
摘要

From the dawn of the air power age to today, airfields have been recognized as essential military facilities, and combatants have gone to great lengths to destroy enemy aircraft on the ground (where they are most vulnerable) and to deny the use of airfields through attacks on runways, fuel storage, and other supporting assets.

,

The RAND Corporation has worked on issues related to analyzing air base defense and attack (ABD/A) for 70 years — supporting the analysis of its U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. Air Force (USAF) sponsors and sometimes leading the way. This report documents and highlights RAND's many contributions to the analysis of ABD/A over time and identifies enduring insights for improving the resiliency of U.S. air bases in the face of modern threats.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    A Statistical Overview of RAND Research on Air Base Attack and Defense, 1951–2020

  • Chapter Three

    Nuclear Threats to U.S. Air Force Bases in the United States and Europe, 1950–1959

  • Chapter Four

    A Shift Toward Conventional and Offensive Operations, 1960–1969

  • Chapter Five

    Conventional Warfare in Central Europe, 1970–1989

  • Chapter Six

    Era of Rear Area Sanctuary for the U.S. Air Force, 1990–2009

  • Chapter Seven

    Anti-Access Threat to U.S. Bases Reinvigorates Analysis of Air Base Defense, 2010–2020

  • Chapter Eight

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    Statistics on Report Authors and Co-Author Networks

  • Appendix B

    First Authors by Decade

  • Appendix C

    Chronological Listing of Publicly Available RAND Reports on Air Base Attack or Defense

主题Air Defense ; Air Warfare ; Defense Infrastructure ; Military Facilities ; United States Air Force
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA793-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524381
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Alan J. Vick,Mark Ashby. Winning the Battle of the Airfields: Seventy Years of RAND Analysis on Air Base Defense and Attack. 2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA793-1.pdf(4976KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1619546091336.jpg.p(4KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Alan J. Vick]的文章
[Mark Ashby]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Alan J. Vick]的文章
[Mark Ashby]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Alan J. Vick]的文章
[Mark Ashby]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA793-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1619546091336.jpg.pagespeed.ic.UyNvS3VhsL.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。