Gateway to Think Tanks
来源类型 | Report |
规范类型 | 报告 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1074-1 |
来源ID | RR-A1074-1 |
Deciphering Chinese Deterrence Signalling in the New Era: An Analytic Framework and Seven Case Studies | |
Nathan Beauchamp-Mustafaga; Derek Grossman; Kristen Gunness; Michael S. Chase; Marigold Black; Natalia D. Simmons-Thomas | |
发表日期 | 2021-05-27 |
出版年 | 2021 |
页码 | 215 |
语种 | 英语 |
结论 | China has shown that it takes a comprehensive approach to deterrence and deterrence signalling, one that is based on the use of multiple instruments of national power—not only military strength but also economic leverage, diplomatic influence, and information manipulation
A comprehensive framework of accurate and nuanced interpretation of Chinese deterrence signalling is crucial for policymakers
|
摘要 | In Xi Jinping's 'new era', Chinese ambitions are increasingly global, its behaviour is increasingly aggressive, and its military is increasingly a leading edge of national power. China is also changing its approach to deterrence signalling in this 'new era' as it leverages growing military capabilities and the availability of new communication channels. ,This report is intended to help analysts and policymakers in Australia, the United States, and other countries better decipher Chinese deterrence signalling in this 'new era'. For China, deterrence (威慑, weishe) is not simply the objective of forestalling an adversary's undesired action, as in Western thinking—it also includes aspects of compellence, meaning that China often uses its military to coerce other countries to take actions Beijing desires. This report provides an analytic framework to interpret Chinese deterrence signalling and explores seven case studies of recent Chinese deterrence behaviour to illuminate what has stayed the same and what has changed in Chinese peacetime and crisis deterrence signalling. ,Overall, although China's capabilities and communication channels have changed, its fundamental approach to military deterrence signalling as a form of political coercion has not changed. Rather, Beijing is employing military deterrence signalling more frequently and in bolder ways to achieve its grander objectives. This means that analysts are likely to face an ever-greater task of deciphering this ever-expanding milieu to ensure that policymakers can separate the signal from the noise and respond to what matters (and look past what does not) to better manage future crises. |
目录 |
|
主题 | Australia ; China ; Global Security ; Information Operations ; Low-Intensity Conflict ; Nuclear Deterrence ; United States |
URL | https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1074-1.html |
来源智库 | RAND Corporation (United States) |
引用统计 | |
资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524458 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Nathan Beauchamp-Mustafaga,Derek Grossman,Kristen Gunness,et al. Deciphering Chinese Deterrence Signalling in the New Era: An Analytic Framework and Seven Case Studies. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
RAND_RRA1074-1.pdf(1136KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 | ||
x1622117549762.jpg.p(2KB) | 智库出版物 | 限制开放 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。