G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A617-1
来源IDRR-A617-1
An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability: Early Development of the Army Interoperability Measurement System (AIMS)
Bryan W. Hallmark; Christopher G. Pernin; Andrea M. Abler; Ryan Haberman; Sale Lilly; Samantha McBirney; Angela O'Mahony; Erik E. Mueller
发表日期2021-09-22
出版年2021
语种英语
结论
  • No current option had all the characteristics that would be required by the Army's interoperability system.
摘要

The National Defense Strategy (NDS) emphasizes the need for U.S. forces to be interoperable with capable allies and partners. To support the NDS, the U.S. Army develops and executes doctrine and guidelines for how its units can achieve interoperability with partners. The Army identified a need to develop an overarching concept for interoperability that includes explicit links between current Army multinational interoperability doctrine and mission command doctrine. Concurrently, it wanted an enduring and standardized way to measure levels of interoperability achieved as a result of major training events. To that end, the Army asked RAND Arroyo Center to conduct an analysis of alternatives (AoA) of interoperability measurement systems.

,

Researchers looked at eight different approaches, gathering and analyzing data from a review of materials provided by representatives for each approach and information from multiple rounds of interviews with representatives. No single approach addressed all dimensions identified as important for a future system, so a completely new approach was proposed, drawing on strengths and eliminating weaknesses from other approaches analyzed. The Army decided to develop a new system — the Army Interoperability Measurement System (AIMS), which includes a quantitative instrument for measuring interoperability levels, a qualitative component to enable capability gap analysis, an automated approach to connect and analyze the data, and exploitation panels that convene immediately following a training exercise.

,

The authors document their AoA, present the supporting evidence for their measurement system recommendations, and details the early development of AIMS.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Considerations

  • Chapter Three

    Analysis of Alternatives

  • Chapter Four

    Recommendations from the Analysis of Alternatives

  • Chapter Five

    Early Stages of Army Interoperability Measurement System Development

  • Chapter Six

    Concluding Remarks

  • Appendix A

    Analysis of Alternatives Questions List

  • Appendix B

    Completed Questions List for All Considered Alternatives

  • Appendix C

    ART Level I and Level II Tasks Included in AIMS Instruments

  • Appendix D

    Interoperability in Army Mission Essential Tasks

  • Appendix E

    Computing Priority Force Area Interoperability Levels

主题Military Logistics ; Military Strategy ; United States Army ; Warfare and Military Operations
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA617-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524565
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bryan W. Hallmark,Christopher G. Pernin,Andrea M. Abler,et al. An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Measuring Multinational Interoperability: Early Development of the Army Interoperability Measurement System (AIMS). 2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA617-1.pdf(605KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1632317272667.jpg.p(1KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bryan W. Hallmark]的文章
[Christopher G. Pernin]的文章
[Andrea M. Abler]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bryan W. Hallmark]的文章
[Christopher G. Pernin]的文章
[Andrea M. Abler]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bryan W. Hallmark]的文章
[Christopher G. Pernin]的文章
[Andrea M. Abler]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA617-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1632317272667.jpg.pagespeed.ic.B0a39NBJsC.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。