G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA1355-1
来源IDRR-A1355-1
SAFE Charlotte: Alternative Response Models and Disparities in Policing
Molly M. Simmons; Daniel Tapia; Richard H. Donohue; Denis Agniel; Matthew L. Mizel; Lisa Wagner; Amanda Charbonneau; Danielle Sobol
发表日期2021-09-28
出版年2022
页码203
语种英语
结论

The authors analyzed all calls for service in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD) system from 2015 through 2020

  • The most frequent routine-priority call types were noise complaints, traffic accidents and infractions, and thefts from vehicles.
  • Routine-priority calls accounted for 10 to 20 percent of calls at all hours of the day.
  • Illegal parking, found property, sharing or requesting information, picking up property or evidence, and road blockages were the routine-priority call types associated with the lowest risk.
  • A total of 261,439 calls (7 percent of all calls) were potentially related to mental health, substance abuse, and homelessness.
  • Calls flagged as potentially related to mental health were overwhelmingly welfare checks (73.6 percent).
  • Calls flagged for substance abuse were most often overdoses (54.1 percent).

Black residents in Charlotte were more likely to be stopped both as a driver and as a pedestrian and, when stopped, were more likely to be arrested

  • The rate at which Black motorists were stopped was two to three times higher than the rate at which White motorists were stopped.
  • Black pedestrians were stopped at much higher rates than White pedestrians were.
  • White pedestrians were stopped at higher rates than Asian and Hispanic pedestrians were.
  • Black motorists were requested for a consent to search at much higher rates than White motorists were.
  • Asian motorists were much less likely to be stopped, much less likely to be requested for a consent to search when they were stopped, and less likely to be arrested as a result of a stop.
摘要

Under contract with Charlotte, North Carolina, the authors evaluated three of the six policing and public-safety recommendations in the city's SAFE Charlotte: Safety and Accountability for Everyone report. Recommendation 2 is about developing ways to implement a civilian response for low-risk duties. Recommendation 3 requested independent analysis of police–community member contact to determine the extent to which racial/ethnic bias is evident in policing in Charlotte. Recommendation 4 states that Charlotte's Community Policing Crisis Response Team should be expanded, and a specialized civilian responder model should be explored for those experiencing mental health crisis and homelessness.

,

The authors recommend two pilot programs: (1) a new team of clinicians who would deploy in pairs to provide services that could help address substance abuse, mental health, and homelessness and (2) a program that would delegate low-risk, low-priority calls to nonspecialized civilian responders. The estimated costs for the clinician team pilot would be approximately $850,000 for the first year. The estimated costs for the pilot of civilian responders for low-risk, low-priority calls would be approximately $1.4 million to $1.85 million for the first year. Local stakeholders should be involved in every aspect of development and implementation of all potential programs — from hiring to uniforms. The authors analyzed stop data, arrest data, and complaint data and found that Black residents in Charlotte were more likely to be stopped both as a driver and as a pedestrian and, when stopped, were more likely to be arrested.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Background

  • Chapter Two

    SAFE recommendations 2 and 4: Alternative responses for low-risk calls and CPCRT Expansion

  • Chapter Three

    SAFE Recommendation 3: Analysis of Police-Community Member Contact and Police Calls and Responses

  • Chapter Four

    RAND Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Interview Protocols

  • Appendix B

    Qualitative Codebook

  • Appendix C

    Statistical Annex

  • Appendix D

    Resource Guide

  • Appendix E

    Job Descriptions

主题Community Health and Well-Being ; Emergency Services and Response ; Police-Community Relations ; Racial Discrimination
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1355-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524575
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Molly M. Simmons,Daniel Tapia,Richard H. Donohue,et al. SAFE Charlotte: Alternative Response Models and Disparities in Policing. 2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA1355-1.pdf(2714KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
x1643830972177.jpg.p(0KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Molly M. Simmons]的文章
[Daniel Tapia]的文章
[Richard H. Donohue]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Molly M. Simmons]的文章
[Daniel Tapia]的文章
[Richard H. Donohue]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Molly M. Simmons]的文章
[Daniel Tapia]的文章
[Richard H. Donohue]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA1355-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: x1643830972177.jpg.pagespeed.ic.1fAKXk9LeH.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。