G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A750-1
来源IDRR-A750-1
Soldier Preferences and Retention Effects of Changes in Army Reserve Training Requirements: An Exploration of Revealed and Stated Behavior
Craig A. Bond; Ellen M. Pint; Stephan B. Seabrook; Christina Panis
发表日期2021-11-16
出版年2021
语种英语
结论
  • Soldiers in higher pay grades and who had one or more children and higher education levels were less likely to separate from the USAR, as were enlisted personnel who were African American, Asian, or Pacific Islanders.
  • Reserve soldiers planning to stay in the USAR beyond their current obligation prefer a slight increase in AT (but not up to four weeks) and the status quo 48 periods of IDT per year.
  • Most soldiers reported preferring a weekend IDT schedule to shifting some training to weeknights and preferring one continuous period of AT rather than splitting it into multiple periods.
  • An increase in AT of a week or more from the current two weeks would result in a statistically significant share of officers who were planning to stay under the old policy instead choosing to leave the USAR.
  • Retention intentions would be decreased if the minimum IDT level per policy were decreased to fewer than 48 periods per year for both enlisted personnel and officers.
摘要

Soldiers in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) have traditionally been required to attend 39 days of training per year: one weekend per month (24 days, equivalent to 48 periods of inactive duty training [IDT]) and 15 days (about two full weeks) of annual training (AT). However, across the readiness cycle, some units may have increased training requirements, while others may have their requirements changed with minimal notice. The authors examine how changes in training requirements affect soldiers' interest in staying in the USAR and how their civilian employment and family situations influence that decision.

,

The authors examined administrative data on USAR soldiers and units to identify past changes in unit-level training requirements and whether they affected soldier retention or transfers to other units. The authors also surveyed currently serving Troop Program Unit soldiers to gather information on the effects of changes in training requirements on their retention intentions and their preferences for different training options.

,

In their analysis of the survey, the authors found that, on average, soldiers prefer a slight increase in the number of AT days (2.5–3 weeks, or 18–21 days) and prefer the status quo of 48 IDT periods. In addition, most soldiers prefer a weekend IDT schedule to shifting some training to weeknights and one continuous period of AT rather than splitting it into multiple periods. However, these averages obscure important differences in preferences across the sample, prompting the authors to review how demographic and service-related characteristics affect intentions to stay in the USAR.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Recent Trends in Training Requirements and Retention

  • Chapter Three

    Survey Development and Methodology

  • Chapter Four

    Survey Results

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Solicitation Email and Survey Instrument

  • Appendix B

    Contingent Behavior Results

  • Appendix C

    Choice Experiment Results

  • Appendix D

    Summary Statistics

主题Enlisted Personnel ; Military Education and Training ; Military Officers ; Military Personnel Retention ; Military Reserves ; United States Army
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA750-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524634
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Craig A. Bond,Ellen M. Pint,Stephan B. Seabrook,et al. Soldier Preferences and Retention Effects of Changes in Army Reserve Training Requirements: An Exploration of Revealed and Stated Behavior. 2021.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA750-1.pdf(476KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1635193765191.jpg(5KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Craig A. Bond]的文章
[Ellen M. Pint]的文章
[Stephan B. Seabrook]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Craig A. Bond]的文章
[Ellen M. Pint]的文章
[Stephan B. Seabrook]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Craig A. Bond]的文章
[Ellen M. Pint]的文章
[Stephan B. Seabrook]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA750-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1635193765191.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。