全球智库信息集成服务系统

Multi-domain thinking in context

• In understanding the multi-domain approaches of potential adversaries, it is useful to distinguish the 'narrow' military operational aspects from the broader context of geopolitical and strategic competition.

Focus on information advantage

• Russia, China, Iran and North Korea all emphasise superiority in the information domain as critical to success in a multi-domain conflict, with a particular focus on seizing a decisive advantage in the competition phase or early stages of a conflict.
• Systems thinking shapes adversary approaches to countering perceived Western military superiority, with an emphasis on striking key nodes or linkages within that 'system of systems' to paralyse and disrupt command and control.

Translating emerging concepts into practice

• The emergence of multi-domain thinking in Russia, China, Iran and North Korea has been largely reactive, shaped by threat perceptions and their own geostrategic realities. In the absence of explicit doctrine, some adversary activities (e.g., force structuration and modernisation, reforms, capabilities acquisition, operations) are nonetheless indicative of multi-domain concepts beginning to translate into practice.

The UK is confronted with a strategic and operational environment characterised by complex interactions between multiple domains (e.g., maritime, land, air, space and cyber and electromagnetic). To counter perceived Western military advantages, potential adversaries of the UK have developed ways of expanding the battlespace and blurring traditional distinctions between war and peace, public and private, domestic and foreign, and the physical and virtual. At the same time, new operational domains and environments present the UK, its allies and partners with novel opportunities to exploit the vulnerabilities of adversaries.

This proliferation of domains increases the necessity but also the difficulty of developing and implementing effective strategy and operational art. This mounting challenge necessitates the development of new operating concepts as a guide to future capability and force development, ensuring that the UK has a coherent theory of how to prepare, operate, deter, fight and win.

In this context, the Global Strategic Partnership, a research consortium led by RAND Europe, was commissioned by the UK Ministry of Defence to support the development of a UK concept of Multi-Domain Integration. This seeks to enable the UK to maintain advantage by exploiting the integration of activities across domains. In particular, the study aimed to investigate the nature, extent and drivers of adversaries' own evolving thinking on this topic.

The study findings contributed to the development of the UK concept of Multi-Domain Integration and the associated Joint Concept Note (JCN) 1/20.

• Chapter One

  Introduction

• Chapter Two

  What is meant by Multi-Domain Integration?

• Chapter Three

  What are key trends, similarities and differences in international approaches to MDI?

• Chapter Four

  What are the lessons and implications for the UK?

• Annex A

  Case study: Russian Federation

• Annex B

  Case study: People's Republic of China