全球智库信息集成服务系统

Process evaluation findings

• The career navigators' responsibilities included providing CTE students with academic and career advice, facilitating contacts with employers and other supports, and outreach to employers and community stakeholders.
• Facility staff noted that the CN program fit well with MNDOC's mission and students' education and training needs. The students also felt that the career navigators filled an important gap in their support needs.
• It took time to clarify the role of the career navigators. with initial confusion between the career navigators, EMPLOY staff, and transition coordinators regarding their respective roles and the coordination of their efforts.
• Delays in implementing the CN program had implications for the full implementation of the CN model, resulting in career navigators only able to provide services to program participants from April–May 2019 to about May 2020.

Outcomes evaluation findings

• Because few members of the comparison group had been released from prison, we were unable to conduct propensity score matching to statistically control for differences between CN program participants and the comparison group. Only descriptive analyses were conducted.
• Less than 5 percent of CN program participants were returned to custody within six months of release. At one year, 8.5 percent of program participants returned to prison. Return-to-custody rates for new convictions were lower for the CN participants than for the Minnesota population in general.
• About half of individuals were employed during the first year after release. There were no statistically significant differences in employment results between the CN program participants and the comparison group.

Career navigators assist individuals with college and training opportunities when they return to the community and at the front end of the corrections process (while they are still incarcerated) to identify academic education and career technical education (CTE) programs that align with their interests and that will enable them to earn certificates or degrees in their chosen field. In recent years, career navigators have been increasingly viewed as an important part of correctional education, particularly given the significant increase in postsecondary education opportunities for incarcerated individuals.

The Minnesota Department of Corrections (MNDOC) recognized a key gap in its education strategic plan — the lack of career navigators — and conceived of the concept of its Career Navigators (CN) program to address this gap. The Ascendium Education Group (formerly the Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corporation) awarded a grant to the RAND Corporation, in partnership with RTI International, to conduct an independent evaluation of MNDOC's CN program.

This research report presents the final findings from RAND's evaluation of the CN program. This report should be of interest to educators who develop and provide education programs for incarcerated adults, subject-matter experts who study correctional education, and to corrections officials and policymakers.

• Chapter One

  Introduction

• Chapter Two

  The Sample

• Chapter Three

  Process Evaluation Findings

• Chapter Four

  Review of Career Navigator Programs

• Chapter Five

  Outcomes Evaluation Findings

• Chapter Six

  Conclusions

• Appendix A

  DEED Description for the Career Navigator Position

• Appendix B

  Detailed Employment Tables