G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RR-A753-1
来源IDRR-A753-1
Understanding Civilian Harm in Raqqa and Its Implications for Future Conflicts
Michael J. McNerney; Gabrielle Tarini; Nate Rosenblatt; Karen M. Sudkamp; Pauline Moore; Michelle Grisé; Benjamin J. Sacks; Larry Lewis
发表日期2022-03-31
出版年2022
语种英语
结论
  • U.S. strategic choices, such as the encirclement of Raqqa, likely increased civilian harm.
  • The coalition made considerable efforts to protect civilian life, but there remains room for improvement.
  • Civilian casualties in Raqqa were not as high as one might predict, given the high levels of structural damage.
  • ISIS's defensive tactics deliberately put civilians in harm's way.
  • Extensive structural damage in Raqqa undermined post-battle governing prospects and long-term U.S. interests.
  • Airpower was not used to shape the battlefield in Raqqa, which made civilian-harm mitigation more difficult.
  • Restrictions on U.S. ground forces made preventing civilian harm more difficult.
  • Irregular partner forces were less precise than U.S. forces would be and increased the risk of civilian harm.
  • A lack of sources to provide better local information impeded civilian-harm mitigation efforts.
  • Flawed DoD processes and poor collection of civilian casualty data hindered the military's ability to assess and analyze civilian harm in Raqqa.
摘要

The battle for Raqqa, Syria, seemed like a perfect storm of strategic and operational challenges. When the city was finally liberated from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in October 2017, 60 to 80 percent of it was estimated to be uninhabitable. In fact, the battle for Raqqa is a cautionary tale about civilian harm in 21st-century conflicts.

,

The purpose of this report is to discuss how the U.S. military — which is the best-trained and most technologically advanced military in the world, is supported in Operation Inherent Resolve by an international coalition of more than 80 countries, and was partnered in Raqqa with a well-respected militia force on the ground — could cause significant civilian harm despite a deeply ingrained commitment to the law of war.

,

In this report, RAND researchers study the causes of civilian harm in Raqqa and provide insights into how the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) can reduce civilian harm in future operations.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    DoD Policies and Procedures for Mitigating Civilian Harm

  • Chapter Three

    The Battle for Raqqa: Overview and Operational Approach

  • Chapter Four

    Civilian Harm in the Battle for Raqqa

  • Chapter Five

    The Contribution of ISIS Defensive Tactics to Civilian Harm in Raqqa

  • Chapter Six

    Civilian-Harm Mitigation Challenges for Air Forces

  • Chapter Seven

    Civilian-Harm Mitigation Challenges for Ground Forces

  • Chapter Eight

    Civilian-Harm Mitigation Challenges Working by, with, and Through Partners

  • Chapter Nine

    Civilian-Harm Mitigation Challenges for Intelligence Efforts

  • Chapter Ten

    Challenges Identifying, Reporting, and Investigating Civilian Harm in Raqqa

  • Chapter Eleven

    Findings and Recommendations

主题Asymmetric Warfare ; Imagery Intelligence ; The Islamic State (Terrorist Organization) ; Law of War ; Military Intelligence ; Military Tactics ; Syria ; Urban Warfare
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA753-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524757
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michael J. McNerney,Gabrielle Tarini,Nate Rosenblatt,et al. Understanding Civilian Harm in Raqqa and Its Implications for Future Conflicts. 2022.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA753-1.pdf(4676KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1648685005407.jpg(9KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Gabrielle Tarini]的文章
[Nate Rosenblatt]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Gabrielle Tarini]的文章
[Nate Rosenblatt]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michael J. McNerney]的文章
[Gabrielle Tarini]的文章
[Nate Rosenblatt]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA753-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1648685005407.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。