G2TT
来源类型Report
规范类型报告
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RRA739-4
来源IDRR-A739-4
The Limits of Restraint: The Military Implications of a Restrained U.S. Grand Strategy in the Asia-Pacific
Miranda Priebe; Kristen Gunness; Karl P. Mueller; Zachary Burdette
发表日期2022-03-31
出版年2022
语种英语
结论
  • Restrainers have a variety of views about when to use force in the Asia-Pacific.
  • For many restrainers, the primary driver of U.S. posture in the region would be the defense of Japan.
  • Defending Japan against a major Chinese attack would likely require maintaining some forward-deployed U.S. naval forces and pre-positioned materiel in the Asia-Pacific.
  • Restrainers would need to prioritize strategic airlift and sealift to deploy air and naval forces quickly and in large numbers from the United States.
  • Restrainers' limited objectives in the Asia-Pacific would be consistent with reductions in forward-deployed ground forces and, possibly, land-based air forces.
  • Given China's ability to target bases and ports, the United States would still need access to a large number of wartime operating locations in partner countries to increase the survivability of its forces involved in the defense of Japan.
  • To have the capability to impose a distant blockade on China, the United States would need to maintain a large navy and have wartime access to ports in the region.
  • Like current policymakers, restrainers would face trade-offs between maximizing U.S. preparedness for conflict and incentivizing burden-sharing by other states.
摘要

In recent years, there has been growing interest among policymakers and foreign policy analysts in rethinking U.S. grand strategy, or the U.S. approach to the world. One of the most prominent alternatives to current U.S. grand strategy is a grand strategy of restraint, an approach that would define U.S. interests more narrowly, place a greater emphasis on diplomacy, reduce the size of the military and U.S. forward military presence, renegotiate or end U.S. security commitments, and raise the bar for the use of force.

,

Advocates of restraint have broadly outlined their views, but there is a lack of detail about what a strategy of restraint would mean in practice for U.S. security policy. In this report, RAND researchers describe when the United States might use force in the Asia-Pacific region under a grand strategy of restraint, propose possible warfighting scenarios involving the defense of Japan that could guide U.S. Department of Defense planning, and describe how U.S. military posture in the region would change under such a strategy.

目录
  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Operationalizing Restraint in the Asia-Pacific

  • Chapter Three

    China Attacks Japan's Armed Forces and Economy

  • Chapter Four

    After Occupying Taiwan, China Seizes the Southern Ryukyu Islands

  • Chapter Five

    The United States Imposes a Distant Blockade on China During a War Between China and Japan

  • Chapter Six

    Conclusion

主题China ; Global Security ; Japan ; Military Force Deployment ; Military Strategy ; Pacific Ocean ; South Korea ; United States
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA739-4.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/524759
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Miranda Priebe,Kristen Gunness,Karl P. Mueller,et al. The Limits of Restraint: The Military Implications of a Restrained U.S. Grand Strategy in the Asia-Pacific. 2022.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RRA739-4.pdf(1881KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
1648128642758.jpg(6KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA缩略图
浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Miranda Priebe]的文章
[Kristen Gunness]的文章
[Karl P. Mueller]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Miranda Priebe]的文章
[Kristen Gunness]的文章
[Karl P. Mueller]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Miranda Priebe]的文章
[Kristen Gunness]的文章
[Karl P. Mueller]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RRA739-4.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
文件名: 1648128642758.jpg
格式: JPEG

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。