全球智库信息集成服务系统

Key Findings

• The uneven exposure of installations to natural hazards means that for the DAF to get the most out of its resilience resources, it should look critically at the entire enterprise.
• For some hazards, although only a fraction of an installation might be exposed, this exposure could have a disproportionate effect on mission performance.
• Portions of 20 DAF bases have high or very high wildfire potential. A few bases have nearby power transmission infrastructure in areas with much higher wildfire potential than the base.
• A few installations facing multiple hazards deserve special attention because of the difficulty of formulating policies that address multi-hazard exposure. The following coastal installations face multiple hazards: Eglin, Hurlburt, Keesler, Langley, MacDill, Patrick, and Tyndall.
• Although enterprise-level assessments of exposure can provide insights for the DAF, they do not replace deeper-dive, local assessments.