G2TT
来源类型Research Brief
规范类型简报
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7249/RBA1154-1
来源IDRB-A1154-1
Fit for Duty: Alternative Approaches for Determining Department of Defense Disability Compensation
Stephanie Rennane; Beth J. Asch; Michael G. Mattock; Heather Krull; Douglas C. Ligor; Michael Dworsky; Jonas Kempf
发表日期2022-02-09
出版年2022
页码6
语种英语
结论

Key Findings

  • A fitness-for-duty evaluation system (FES) reduces reliance on Department of Defense (DoD) disability ratings for determining DoD disability compensation and relies primarily on a single decision about whether a service member is fit to perform their duties.
  • With one exception, none of the FES alternatives evaluated guarantees that all service members would see benefits at least as large as the benefits they qualify for under the current system.
  • Eliminating or delaying the rating step would reduce processing times under a FES by an average of 29 days relative to the current sequential process.
  • The estimated time savings associated with implementing an alternative system imply that active-duty end strength for the Army enlisted force would fall by at most 0.2 percent relative to the current system.
  • Any alternative system should be evaluated not only on the basis of direct costs and benefits but also on whether it is consistent with the broader objective of disability compensation.
主题Military Compensation ; Military Health and Health Care ; People with Disabilities ; United States Department of Defense
URLhttps://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RBA1154-1.html
来源智库RAND Corporation (United States)
引用统计
资源类型智库出版物
条目标识符http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/525220
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Stephanie Rennane,Beth J. Asch,Michael G. Mattock,et al. Fit for Duty: Alternative Approaches for Determining Department of Defense Disability Compensation. 2022.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 资源类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
RAND_RBA1154-1.pdf(172KB)智库出版物 限制开放CC BY-NC-SA浏览
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Stephanie Rennane]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Stephanie Rennane]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Stephanie Rennane]的文章
[Beth J. Asch]的文章
[Michael G. Mattock]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: RAND_RBA1154-1.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。