| 来源类型 | Journal articles |
| 规范类型 | 论文 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.003 |
| Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis | |
| Neal Haddaway | |
| 发表日期 | 2022-03-17 |
| 出版年 | 2022 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 概述 | How frequent are data and code availability statements in a random sample of systematic reviews? The article estimates the frequency of data with meta-analysis. |
| 摘要 | This article estimates the frequency of data and code availability statements in a random sample of systematic reviews with meta-analysis of aggregate data, summarizes the content of the statements, and investigates how often data and code files were shared. |
| 主题 | Health : Well-being ; Gender : Behaviour and choice ; Economy : Behaviour and choice |
| 标签 | evidence synthesis |
| 区域 | Africa ; Americas ; Asia ; Europe ; Oceania |
| URL | https://www.sei.org/publications/data-code-availability-statements-systematic-reviews-interventions-missing/ |
| 来源智库 | Stockholm Environment Institute (Sweden) |
| 引用统计 | |
| 资源类型 | 智库出版物 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.153/handle/2XGU8XDN/525292 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Neal Haddaway. Data and code availability statements in systematic reviews of interventions were often missing or inaccurate: a content analysis. 2022. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Neal Haddaway]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Neal Haddaway]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Neal Haddaway]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
